A correspondent shared this piece of reporting and his thoughts on it recently:
Senate bill would force POTUS to share intel with Israel.
His thoughts: A few years into the future, breast beating Christians and others will be wondering how things have gotten so much worse economically and with respect to security and liberty in this country. Just as they do now about [many such political and moral] problems that they ignored at the very time that called for opposition.
As we have seen now for 50+ years, Libertarians in particular have tried to use the political election process to bring sanity to public affairs and restore at least some liberty. This “solution” has failed.
Others, including libertarians (lovers of liberty), at times, have tried the protest and petition route to get changes made. Once again, that “solution” has failed.
Our thoughts, here at TPOL, on P’s comments:
You are right; we can expect more of this in the near future. It is not just people like the man who is likely to replace Maine’s Collins in the Senate. (She’s bad, but he appears to be even worse.) It is people in both old parties who continue to demonstrate the truth of Acton’s Dictum. As a calculus equation, the upper limit of power is infinity, so the corruption is also unlimited.
We have surrendered power for more than a century and a half to the parasites (elected and appointed) in DC and fifty State capitols and thousands of local jurisdictions. We have given them power over our minute-to-minute lives that I think it is safe to say that few nations and societies in history have ever held.
Yet we continue to claim that we are free, in this Anno Libertatus 250.
Continue reading



Disarmament 101
A neat, short guest commentary by Ryan Stubblefield
Ryan was asked this question, by a hoplophobe: Since there are more people who don’t own guns than there are people who do own guns here in the States, why don’t those non-gunowners disarm their “fearful neighbors?” That way, “we can live in a safe society free from firearms…” right?
Brian’s response is classic:
We’ll make this simple. 1/3 of the population of the U.S owns guns.
That leaves a 2 to 1 ratio of people taking their guns, Yes?
Should be plenty, normally is.
None of you are armed. I am.
Come to my door, tell me you’re taking my guns.
I instantly shoot your neighbor in the face. This fast. Say, “Bam Bam!”
I let you walk away. Now, it’s 1 on 1.
Not good odds. Right?
Don’t forget, you came onto my property and threatened to steal my guns. I don’t go to prison when I shoot your neighbor in self defense.
You go to prison for a few years for trespassing and attempted larceny of a firearm.
I’m out, free. You’re in. Your neighbor is dead.
Now it’s none to 1.
How’s your plan working out?
A quick edit. Are you afraid of not being safe because of guns? Seems like you’re the fearful neighbor here.
I’m not afraid of anyone. Simply because I can better control my situations, guaranteeing my own safety. You possibly could not. Your post already has marked you as a victim of sorts.
Count our blessings! At least some God-given liberties are recognized in the US Constitution and are not subject to the popular votes of democracy. At least in most of the States.