Guest commentary: what does it matter?

By a correspondent, Kevin Hayslett. Please think on these things.

————

I saw a photograph this week that bothered me.

A boy. Maybe nine or ten. Dark maroon shirt, slightly rumpled. Both hands flat on the glass of a display case at the National Archives. Face almost touching it. Leaning in. Reading a page lit from inside the case. A page covered in signatures from men who have been dead for two hundred years.

Not posing. Not bored. Reading.

A guard in a dark uniform stands a few yards behind him, hands folded, watching the boy instead of the case.

I don’t know his name. Let’s call him Sam.

Sam is nine. Sam will be old enough to vote in 2034.

Sam is trying to understand the rules the adults no longer want to follow.

Four miles away, a former Vice President of the United States was reading aloud a list of things to do to that document.

The recording is still up. Almost nobody watched it carefully.

She did not walk in with convictions. She walked in with bullet points. Fed to her one sentence at a time. Curated to ignite a weary base looking for a contender. Written somewhere else for reasons nobody in that room voted on.

A whiteboard in the corner with four words on it.

Court.

College.

Districts.

States.

She said exactly what they told her to say. Then she went home.

Because she was not the point.

The list was for whoever they pick next.

She was the dress rehearsal.

The audience thought they were watching a conversation. They were watching a blueprint.

Here is what she said, word for word.

“This is a moment where there are no bad ideas.”

No bad ideas. When the system itself is on the table.

Then she read the list.

Reform the Electoral College. Expand the Supreme Court. Replace single-member congressional districts with multi-member districts. Statehood for D.C. and Puerto Rico.

Fifty-nine presidential elections. Two close ones. That is the entire case for tearing it down.

Nine justices for a hundred and fifty-six years. She wants more.

Fifty states for sixty-five years. She wants fifty-two.

Four hundred and thirty-five districts. She wants to scrap that too.

She did not whisper any of it. She read it to a room that applauded.

I have spent forty years in courtrooms listening carefully to the words people pick when they think nobody is paying attention.

Pack the court when your side wins, and the other side packs it the minute they take it back. Once the number is political, there is no number.

Reform the Electoral College down to a popular tally, and your state goes quiet. Six counties in three states pick every president from here. Florida does not matter. Ohio does not matter. Pennsylvania does not matter.

Add two states to lock in four senators, and the next majority adds two of their own. Then two more after that. The Senate stops being a safeguard and turns into arithmetic.

Trade single-member districts for multi-member districts, and the seat your county has held for a hundred years gets parceled out to strangers from cities you have never been to.

Picture it.

A Tuesday in November. Eight years from now. Sam is seventeen. Sam is standing in line with his father at the elementary school where his father has voted for thirty years. The fluorescent lights. The styrofoam cup of coffee at the sign-in table. The woman who always sits behind it nods at them the way she always has.

His father fills out the ballot. He feeds it into the machine.

Walking back to the truck, it hits him the way these things always hit you. Slow. In his chest. What he just did did not count anymore. Not because somebody cheated. Because somebody changed the rules while he was busy raising Sam. The map already got drawn. The senators already got added. His state’s name does not appear on any path to 270 because there is no 270. Just a tally somewhere, and his tally went into a column already decided in a building he has never been inside.

He drives home quieter than he left.

Sam is watching from the passenger seat.

Once any of those doors closes behind you, it does not open again.

That is not reform. That is a one-way door.

They are not trying to win the next election. They are trying to make the next election the last one that matters.

This is the part most of us have quietly worried about for years. That win-at-any-cost would eventually mean dismantling the rules instead of winning under them. That the checks and balances built more than two hundred years ago to slow ambitious people down would start looking like obstacles instead of safeguards. Both parties have flirted with it. Neither one wanted to be the first to say it out loud.

We always feared the day someone would.

That day arrived on a Wednesday afternoon in May. Quietly. On a livestream most people scrolled past. The country your grandfather fought for, the country your father voted in, the country Sam will inherit, all of it went on the table at the same time, in a basement studio, on a whiteboard, while the rest of us were checking our phones.

Almost nobody even paused.

Somewhere tonight, that piece of paper is still sitting under glass in the National Archives. The hall is dark. The guard has gone home.

Sam went home too.

He has homework. A spelling test on Friday. He does not know yet what the woman on the recording said about the page he was reading.

He will find out.

We will be the ones who have to tell him.


As lovers of liberty, as with lovers of the Lord, we must always remember that some enemies of liberty (and enemies of Christ) are worse than others. It is clear that the former VPOTUS, and her puppetmasters, are such.

Posted in Commentary on the News, Fiction, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Patriotism and religion

A correspondent (thanks, Ron!) shared this with us:

“Celebrate America, sponsored by First Assembly of God Church of Brazoria, TX included $10,000 worth of fireworks, a 50-foot United States flag, and a replica of the Liberty Bell….drama presentations including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and an illustrated sermon….A moonwalk, antique car show and volleyball….Homemade apple pie, snowcones, sodas, and hot dogs…at 25¢”  (Brazoria County News, 29 June 1995, p. 1). 

He then asked, Is this the work of the church?

While we will answer his question, we will first point out that while “patriotism” is not necessarily viewed as a sin in the Bible, it is certainly not seen as a way to worship (that is, serve and proclaim) the Creator. We also note that patriotism is not necessarily worship of the state (governments). You can be patriotic about your land, about the people and even the achievements and institutions (well, some of them). And not be happy or tolerate the government(s).

Indeed, patriotism is not even connected to being “law-abiding.” And indeed, may be a reason to be a lawbreaker and to oppose, even rebel, against a government.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why isn’t any of this happening?

With the Trump-mandated defeat of the “evil” Tommy Massie (you can tell he’s evil now, because he grew a beard, right?), we are reading stories and commentary about how this is the “death of MAGA.”

We submit that MAGA actually died some time ago, despite rumors of its survival.

Still others are proclaiming this is “the end of the Republican party as we thought we knew it.” (Tucker Carlson)

We submit that the GOP has long, long outlived its usefulness. If indeed it had any true usefulness. Even in the case of its original reason to exist. Or why it claimed to exist. (To end slavery. At least overt slavery of black people.)

But as for MAGA, what all was The Donald 2.0 (2025-2029) going to accomplish? Here is a partial list, thanks (in part) to our friend Jim:

  • An end to income taxes, at least at the Federal level
  • The repeal of Obummercare
  • Release of the JFK, Epstein, and Beer Flu (Coronavirus) files
  • Prosecution of Fauci and all the other con-artists who gave us the Pandemic Panic.
  • End of funding of abortion by the Feds
  • End of the Federal Department of Education
  • Prosecution (and hopefully, conviction and punishment) of the Bidens, Clintons, Obamas, and all their lackeys, shills, and the like (well, at least some of them)
  • Cleaning up elections and election fraud

How many? Very few. Very, very few, and most of what is being pushed as “results” is more eyewash than reality.

The facts are clear: whether or not we believe these things were good ideas or not, they were not done.

But why? The Donald seemed to have recognized his mistakes as Trump 1.0 (2017-2021). He seems to have done things differently this time. And we reiterate: Trump 2.0 is very much far, far better than what we would be enduring with dear Commie Cammi! (AKA, Obummer 4.0)

Why?

Two ideas come to mind – we are sure readers will provide some others.

Did The Donald just lie and lie and lie to us about these things? And never intended to do any of them? Does this go along with that old libertarian meme: anyone capable of being elected to the White House will always be incapable of actually serving well? Or it just that he is no different than any politician: he is incapable of doing anything good?

Or is all of this the result of the Deep State and The Donald’s naivety and inability to deal with them? Are they thwarting him at every turn? Are they just carrying on doing business as usual? As imperial (and even monarchal and republican) regimes and bureaucrats have done since either Nimrod or Sargon invented them? (We here at TPOL think it was Nimrod and Sargon was just riffing off of Nimrod’s composition.)

Of course, as lovers of liberty, we suggest another idea. Human government, being in rebellion against God and His natural order, is incapable of being truly reformed, and the longer an institution exists, the more corrupt it becomes.

This year, as we are told dozens and dozens of times a day in every media and almost every email, we are celebrating what we here at TPOL like to call the year Anno Libertatus 250. 250 years of American independence. Of course, this present institution dates from AD 1787, 21 years later. When the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the articles of present federal Constitution.

(Which brings us to an aside: will the present, butchered and abused US Constitution actually make it to 250 years, or 2047? We have strong doubts.)

If we are to believe what people like Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin believed, the ultimate cause is a failure of the American people to do what needs to be done. The price we must pay for liberty has really not been paid much for a long, long time. (We haven’t even kept up with the interest accrued!)

We submit that failure of Americans to live up to their responsibility for self-government and protecting their liberty is a moral failure. A failure long recognized. As John Adams wrote: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other” Of all that document’s faults, perhaps that weakness is the worst.

Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Put not our trust in princes (or anyone else in power)

There seems to be a constant drumbeat from The Donald verbally attacking various and sundry GOP types who do not consistently support his policies. And with his usual flare, he exaggerates and combines ad hominem attacks in doing so. The man has a tongue on him, and always has. He is also no more to be trusted than any other “prince” or ruler, in either government or business.

Right now, it is Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene bearing the Stateside burden of those attacks. Of course, the targets Trump enjoys and frequently hammers outside the US are even more numerous: Canada, the EU, the UK, Iran, among others.

Trump knows why. And the Lord. No one else. Good or bad, disingenuous or sincere, Donald J Trump is… Donald J Trump.

A trusted correspondent shared this: “I saw a lady arguing that Massie’votes with Democrats 99% of the time.’ Grok, the Twitter/X AI, was called upon to adjudicate this claim, which of course is false. In fact, I hadn’t known this myself: Massie voted with Biden less often than anyone else in the entire House of Representatives: just 1.8 percent of the time.”

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Defending free speech?

By constantly bashing the mainstream media, are we at TPOL attacking free speech? After all, don’t the publishers, editors, and writers of NBC, CNN, The WaPo, NYT, USA Today, The Blaze, WND, and all the rest have the right to speak openly and freely. Whether they are wrong or not?

We defend anyone’s right to speak (write, publish, record, etc.) freely on any subject. Whether right or wrong. But we defend our own God-given right to challenge, contest, disagree, and point out when what they say is wrong. Either when someone fails to tell the truth, or when they twist things around. Not just draw the wrong conclusions but claim that only they know the truth and can explain it properly.

Free speech is not just a fundamental requirement for a republic, or even a “democracy” but for society. As is the right to challenge when someone abuses that right. But the challenge must be appropriate to the offense.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

More on water

This follows up our recent commentary on water issues, especially in the American Southwest.

Environists have a mythology as rich (and wrong) as any other supposed (that is, fake) religion, when it comes to water. These myths are now embedded into school textbooks and media playbooks as much as National Socialism was ever found in schoolbooks of the Third Reich.

Here are some of the myths and examples of them:

Water is consumed and destroyed in use. Especially when it is used to cool electrical power stations, fuel-burning engines, control dust at mines, make concrete, or cool data centers. This is nonsense: water changes form (from liquid to vapor) when it is heated and evaporates. But very little water remains in any project: it is in the air, making air humid and ultimately falling to the earth as rain or snow. Some uses (like washing your hands to “avoid covid-19 or flushing your toilet) does contaminate water, but treatment is relatively easy, relatively inexpensive, and is constantly recycled naturally. The old joke about “flush twice, New Orleans (or where ever downstream) needs the water” is not really a joke. The problem comes when the natural systems (and their manmade enhancements) are overwhelmed by high concentrations of various materials and chemicals. From mud and sand to fertilizers and pesticides and whatever else. And methods of treating (“decontaminating”) water are better and better all the time.

God created this planet with a water cycle:

This planet, sustained by God, is amazing: even really high levels of pollution are naturally managed by this cycle without human intervention.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Psychological terrorism – bio, nuclear, and chemical (and more)

Our recent TPOL commentary about the data center controversy triggers additional feedback and thoughts. Several recent political and social commentaries have pointed out the growing use of psychological terrorism: not actual violence or the threat of violence, but playing on people’s emotions and whipping up their fears.

This is, of course, nothing new. Fearmongering has long been a favored tactic of both tyrants and revolutionaries. Especially the socialist type.

It is also a key method of advertising. Listen to any of the hundreds of common advertisements for medicines, and it is clear. Fear sells just as much as sex does.

Several writers have recently described how fear of infectious disease is “strategically amplified” to shape public behavior. Why? Beyond money, this influences governments, and creates opportunities for those (in power or the right economic position) to benefit from the panic. They call that process “psychological bioterrorism.”

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Data centers: true menace or fearmongering?

DID YOU KNOW… In a recent poll conducted by POLITICO, over 2,000 people said they were willing to support a data center in their area, even if the building causes the rise in their own electricity bills.

Meanwhile:

Nvidia is teaming up with a start-up called Span (No, NOT “Spam”) to put AI data centers into personal homes and businesses. Span is looking to install “nodes” on the side of homes and small commercial businesses for AI cloud providers to extract energy and tap into the network. Supposedly, these work by “absorbing unused electrical capacity” on local grids. (Another challenging assumption: local grid is a misunderstanding in 2026 times.) A home building company (Pulte) is also involved in including mini data centers on new homes.

Span and Nvidia claim that a network of these nodes could equal a small to mid-sized traditional data center. Therefore, there would be no need to build new ones. They offer a carrot: Homeowners might be compensated by reduced energy bills and Wi-Fi charges. 

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What do they fear?

While John Steinbeck seems to have sympathy for socialism, especially in his younger years, and his writings (for example, The Grapes of Wrath) were influential in politics, he still made some very important points that apply to people and institutions in power. Points supporting the need for the restoration and preservation of more liberty. Both personal and economic.

Consider this quote, and apply it to politicians, government bureaucrats (especially jackbooted thugs), parasites (corporate and individual welfare clients), and other large corporations (too many of which are crony capitalists opposed to free markets).

Now, on the face of it, we lovers of liberty have the notion immediately to reject Steinbeck’s comment. It is clearly a rebuttal of Lord Acton’s (John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton) most famous quote:

But perhaps it answers an important question: Why does power corrupt? Steinbeck, despite his political leanings (he never admitted to being a socialist) may have been giving an answer.

The more power we have, the more we fear losing that power. However little we have. If, for example, we enjoy weekends without having to work at a 9-to-5 job, and have our employer tell us otherwise? (… if we want to keep our job.) The idea of losing power over our own schedule and our daily lives causes worry, even fear.

How much more those who have much greater power, whether it is the power of wealth or the power of controlling others.

(We consider another Acton quote: “Liberty is the prevention of control by others.” It is one of several attempts by him to define liberty – a topic for another commentary.)

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Homeschooling under fire

Recently several dozen articles defending homeschooling have crossed our desktop here at The Price of Liberty. Unfortunately, they are vastly outnumbered by articles and comments attacking homeschooling. And at the same time, we are seeing more and more State governments and local school districts and boards working very hard (for the bureaucrats and politicians, at least) to come up with more ways to regulate and restrict homeschooling and “ensure” that parents and their families and friends are “properly educating” their children.

One of the better defenders of homeschooling against these threats is featured in an article on The Blaze. Palmer Luckey, the billionaire IT entrepreneur who invented Oculus Rift (the first really realistic virtual reality headset), jumped down the throat of a commenter who claimed that homeschooling parents should not object to government management and monitoring of the education they are providing to their children.

She wrote, ““If homeschooling is actually super high quality, then homeschooling families should not object to being evaluated, tested, and checked-in-on to make sure their kids are actually learning,”

To us, this smells very much like the idea that, “If you aren’t doing anything wrong, you shouldn’t care if government and anyone else watches what you are doing.” After all, only criminals should be upset if Big Brother is watching them and making it more likely that they will be caught committing a crime.

That, of course, is a hoary old argument that long predates the writing of Brave New World and 1984. And one long rejected. But for those who fear and/or hate homeschooling and loss of government control and the way “public” schools pad the pockets of massive unions, their members, and various industries? It is an excuse and an argument that they think will cause fear and get people to once more commit the futures of their children to never-ending government control.

Many practices and outcomes in public schools are more than detrimental to children. Their exposure to hazards (especially manmade ones) should be unacceptable in a civilized society. Luckey identified some of them, but it is a very long list. And the so-called fears of poor learning by homeschoolers? Demonstrated time and time again to be phantasms. However, the pushers of government monitoring and a “command education” point to 1 or 2 abusive or neglectful parents out of a hundred families, and claim governments can prevent that. This again smells, this time like the hoplophobes and hoploclasts claims about disarming peaceful and honest people.

Even worse, too many private schools follow the “established science” and “proven educational techniques.” And therefore do nearly as poor a job of really teaching the students. It is all too easy for all of us to be brainwashed.

Educating parents who depend on public schools is essential. They far outnumber homeschooling voters, and are constantly bombarded with claims that homeschooled children will grow up ignorantly and unable to support themselves, therefore joining the permanent welfare class. And that homeschoolers “dropping out” of public schools are starving the public schools of funds, since those are often based on average daily attendance numbers. And of course the claim (which has worked for years) that public education problems all have a single solution: throwing more money at it.

They will not learn this from the school districts or other government agencies: they will only find the truth regarding these things when lovers of liberty, homeschooling parents, and homeschooled adults tell them so.

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Leave a comment