Why isn’t any of this happening?

With the Trump-mandated defeat of the “evil” Tommy Massie (you can tell he’s evil now, because he grew a beard, right?), we are reading stories and commentary about how this is the “death of MAGA.”

We submit that MAGA actually died some time ago, despite rumors of its survival.

Still others are proclaiming this is “the end of the Republican party as we thought we knew it.” (Tucker Carlson)

We submit that the GOP has long, long outlived its usefulness. If indeed it had any true usefulness. Even in the case of its original reason to exist. Or why it claimed to exist. (To end slavery. At least overt slavery of black people.)

But as for MAGA, what all was The Donald 2.0 (2025-2029) going to accomplish? Here is a partial list, thanks (in part) to our friend Jim:

  • An end to income taxes, at least at the Federal level
  • The repeal of Obummercare
  • Release of the JFK, Epstein, and Beer Flu (Coronavirus) files
  • Prosecution of Fauci and all the other con-artists who gave us the Pandemic Panic.
  • End of funding of abortion by the Feds
  • End of the Federal Department of Education
  • Prosecution (and hopefully, conviction and punishment) of the Bidens, Clintons, Obamas, and all their lackeys, shills, and the like (well, at least some of them)
  • Cleaning up elections and election fraud

How many? Very few. Very, very few, and most of what is being pushed as “results” is more eyewash than reality.

The facts are clear: whether or not we believe these things were good ideas or not, they were not done.

But why? The Donald seemed to have recognized his mistakes as Trump 1.0 (2017-2021). He seems to have done things differently this time. And we reiterate: Trump 2.0 is very much far, far better than what we would be enduring with dear Commie Cammi! (AKA, Obummer 4.0)

Why?

Two ideas come to mind – we are sure readers will provide some others.

Did The Donald just lie and lie and lie to us about these things? And never intended to do any of them? Does this go along with that old libertarian meme: anyone capable of being elected to the White House will always be incapable of actually serving well? Or it just that he is no different than any politician: he is incapable of doing anything good?

Or is all of this the result of the Deep State and The Donald’s naivety and inability to deal with them? Are they thwarting him at every turn? Are they just carrying on doing business as usual? As imperial (and even monarchal and republican) regimes and bureaucrats have done since either Nimrod or Sargon invented them? (We here at TPOL think it was Nimrod and Sargon was just riffing off of Nimrod’s composition.)

Of course, as lovers of liberty, we suggest another idea. Human government, being in rebellion against God and His natural order, is incapable of being truly reformed, and the longer an institution exists, the more corrupt it becomes.

This year, as we are told dozens and dozens of times a day in every media and almost every email, we are celebrating what we here at TPOL like to call the year Anno Libertatus 250. 250 years of American independence. Of course, this present institution dates from AD 1787, 21 years later. When the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the articles of present federal Constitution.

(Which brings us to an aside: will the present, butchered and abused US Constitution actually make it to 250 years, or 2047? We have strong doubts.)

If we are to believe what people like Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin believed, the ultimate cause is a failure of the American people to do what needs to be done. The price we must pay for liberty has really not been paid much for a long, long time. (We haven’t even kept up with the interest accrued!)

We submit that failure of Americans to live up to their responsibility for self-government and protecting their liberty is a moral failure. A failure long recognized. As John Adams wrote: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other” Of all that document’s faults, perhaps that weakness is the worst.

Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Put not our trust in princes (or anyone else in power)

There seems to be a constant drumbeat from The Donald verbally attacking various and sundry GOP types who do not consistently support his policies. And with his usual flare, he exaggerates and combines ad hominem attacks in doing so. The man has a tongue on him, and always has. He is also no more to be trusted than any other “prince” or ruler, in either government or business.

Right now, it is Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene bearing the Stateside burden of those attacks. Of course, the targets Trump enjoys and frequently hammers outside the US are even more numerous: Canada, the EU, the UK, Iran, among others.

Trump knows why. And the Lord. No one else. Good or bad, disingenuous or sincere, Donald J Trump is… Donald J Trump.

A trusted correspondent shared this: “I saw a lady arguing that Massie’votes with Democrats 99% of the time.’ Grok, the Twitter/X AI, was called upon to adjudicate this claim, which of course is false. In fact, I hadn’t known this myself: Massie voted with Biden less often than anyone else in the entire House of Representatives: just 1.8 percent of the time.”

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Defending free speech?

By constantly bashing the mainstream media, are we at TPOL attacking free speech? After all, don’t the publishers, editors, and writers of NBC, CNN, The WaPo, NYT, USA Today, The Blaze, WND, and all the rest have the right to speak openly and freely. Whether they are wrong or not?

We defend anyone’s right to speak (write, publish, record, etc.) freely on any subject. Whether right or wrong. But we defend our own God-given right to challenge, contest, disagree, and point out when what they say is wrong. Either when someone fails to tell the truth, or when they twist things around. Not just draw the wrong conclusions but claim that only they know the truth and can explain it properly.

Free speech is not just a fundamental requirement for a republic, or even a “democracy” but for society. As is the right to challenge when someone abuses that right. But the challenge must be appropriate to the offense.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

More on water

This follows up our recent commentary on water issues, especially in the American Southwest.

Environists have a mythology as rich (and wrong) as any other supposed (that is, fake) religion, when it comes to water. These myths are now embedded into school textbooks and media playbooks as much as National Socialism was ever found in schoolbooks of the Third Reich.

Here are some of the myths and examples of them:

Water is consumed and destroyed in use. Especially when it is used to cool electrical power stations, fuel-burning engines, control dust at mines, make concrete, or cool data centers. This is nonsense: water changes form (from liquid to vapor) when it is heated and evaporates. But very little water remains in any project: it is in the air, making air humid and ultimately falling to the earth as rain or snow. Some uses (like washing your hands to “avoid covid-19 or flushing your toilet) does contaminate water, but treatment is relatively easy, relatively inexpensive, and is constantly recycled naturally. The old joke about “flush twice, New Orleans (or where ever downstream) needs the water” is not really a joke. The problem comes when the natural systems (and their manmade enhancements) are overwhelmed by high concentrations of various materials and chemicals. From mud and sand to fertilizers and pesticides and whatever else. And methods of treating (“decontaminating”) water are better and better all the time.

God created this planet with a water cycle:

This planet, sustained by God, is amazing: even really high levels of pollution are naturally managed by this cycle without human intervention.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Psychological terrorism – bio, nuclear, and chemical (and more)

Our recent TPOL commentary about the data center controversy triggers additional feedback and thoughts. Several recent political and social commentaries have pointed out the growing use of psychological terrorism: not actual violence or the threat of violence, but playing on people’s emotions and whipping up their fears.

This is, of course, nothing new. Fearmongering has long been a favored tactic of both tyrants and revolutionaries. Especially the socialist type.

It is also a key method of advertising. Listen to any of the hundreds of common advertisements for medicines, and it is clear. Fear sells just as much as sex does.

Several writers have recently described how fear of infectious disease is “strategically amplified” to shape public behavior. Why? Beyond money, this influences governments, and creates opportunities for those (in power or the right economic position) to benefit from the panic. They call that process “psychological bioterrorism.”

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Data centers: true menace or fearmongering?

DID YOU KNOW… In a recent poll conducted by POLITICO, over 2,000 people said they were willing to support a data center in their area, even if the building causes the rise in their own electricity bills.

Meanwhile:

Nvidia is teaming up with a start-up called Span (No, NOT “Spam”) to put AI data centers into personal homes and businesses. Span is looking to install “nodes” on the side of homes and small commercial businesses for AI cloud providers to extract energy and tap into the network. Supposedly, these work by “absorbing unused electrical capacity” on local grids. (Another challenging assumption: local grid is a misunderstanding in 2026 times.) A home building company (Pulte) is also involved in including mini data centers on new homes.

Span and Nvidia claim that a network of these nodes could equal a small to mid-sized traditional data center. Therefore, there would be no need to build new ones. They offer a carrot: Homeowners might be compensated by reduced energy bills and Wi-Fi charges. 

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What do they fear?

While John Steinbeck seems to have sympathy for socialism, especially in his younger years, and his writings (for example, The Grapes of Wrath) were influential in politics, he still made some very important points that apply to people and institutions in power. Points supporting the need for the restoration and preservation of more liberty. Both personal and economic.

Consider this quote, and apply it to politicians, government bureaucrats (especially jackbooted thugs), parasites (corporate and individual welfare clients), and other large corporations (too many of which are crony capitalists opposed to free markets).

Now, on the face of it, we lovers of liberty have the notion immediately to reject Steinbeck’s comment. It is clearly a rebuttal of Lord Acton’s (John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton) most famous quote:

But perhaps it answers an important question: Why does power corrupt? Steinbeck, despite his political leanings (he never admitted to being a socialist) may have been giving an answer.

The more power we have, the more we fear losing that power. However little we have. If, for example, we enjoy weekends without having to work at a 9-to-5 job, and have our employer tell us otherwise? (… if we want to keep our job.) The idea of losing power over our own schedule and our daily lives causes worry, even fear.

How much more those who have much greater power, whether it is the power of wealth or the power of controlling others.

(We consider another Acton quote: “Liberty is the prevention of control by others.” It is one of several attempts by him to define liberty – a topic for another commentary.)

Continue reading
Posted in History of Liberty, Ideas for liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Homeschooling under fire

Recently several dozen articles defending homeschooling have crossed our desktop here at The Price of Liberty. Unfortunately, they are vastly outnumbered by articles and comments attacking homeschooling. And at the same time, we are seeing more and more State governments and local school districts and boards working very hard (for the bureaucrats and politicians, at least) to come up with more ways to regulate and restrict homeschooling and “ensure” that parents and their families and friends are “properly educating” their children.

One of the better defenders of homeschooling against these threats is featured in an article on The Blaze. Palmer Luckey, the billionaire IT entrepreneur who invented Oculus Rift (the first really realistic virtual reality headset), jumped down the throat of a commenter who claimed that homeschooling parents should not object to government management and monitoring of the education they are providing to their children.

She wrote, ““If homeschooling is actually super high quality, then homeschooling families should not object to being evaluated, tested, and checked-in-on to make sure their kids are actually learning,”

To us, this smells very much like the idea that, “If you aren’t doing anything wrong, you shouldn’t care if government and anyone else watches what you are doing.” After all, only criminals should be upset if Big Brother is watching them and making it more likely that they will be caught committing a crime.

That, of course, is a hoary old argument that long predates the writing of Brave New World and 1984. And one long rejected. But for those who fear and/or hate homeschooling and loss of government control and the way “public” schools pad the pockets of massive unions, their members, and various industries? It is an excuse and an argument that they think will cause fear and get people to once more commit the futures of their children to never-ending government control.

Many practices and outcomes in public schools are more than detrimental to children. Their exposure to hazards (especially manmade ones) should be unacceptable in a civilized society. Luckey identified some of them, but it is a very long list. And the so-called fears of poor learning by homeschoolers? Demonstrated time and time again to be phantasms. However, the pushers of government monitoring and a “command education” point to 1 or 2 abusive or neglectful parents out of a hundred families, and claim governments can prevent that. This again smells, this time like the hoplophobes and hoploclasts claims about disarming peaceful and honest people.

Even worse, too many private schools follow the “established science” and “proven educational techniques.” And therefore do nearly as poor a job of really teaching the students. It is all too easy for all of us to be brainwashed.

Educating parents who depend on public schools is essential. They far outnumber homeschooling voters, and are constantly bombarded with claims that homeschooled children will grow up ignorantly and unable to support themselves, therefore joining the permanent welfare class. And that homeschoolers “dropping out” of public schools are starving the public schools of funds, since those are often based on average daily attendance numbers. And of course the claim (which has worked for years) that public education problems all have a single solution: throwing more money at it.

They will not learn this from the school districts or other government agencies: they will only find the truth regarding these things when lovers of liberty, homeschooling parents, and homeschooled adults tell them so.

Posted in Nathan's Rants | Leave a comment

A life of lies and counter-revolutionary action in these 50 States

There are many things which are part of “The Price of Liberty” that lovers of liberty must pay. It is not just our “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” that are sacrificed for freedom.

One of those offerings on the altar of liberty is giving up cherished beliefs and “facts” that were taught us by our parents and grandparents, or even by others whom we love and respect, or schools from kindergarten to graduate school.

Consider Martin Luther King, Jr., one of the demigods of American “civic religion.” He honored by a federal holiday, memorialized by street and school names across the Fifty States, constantly quoted and praised by all corners of the political diamond (even at times by the personal and economic tyrants in the corner opposite libertarians). He is upheld as a “man of God,” a strong advocate of both racial justice and color blindness, and a martyr of liberty and peace.

From the Communist Party USA website honoring Martin Luther King, Jr.

But more and more information has come out about his real convictions, his motives, and his actions. Since his death, and especially in the last 8-10 years. But both before and after he was canonized (deified?) with the public holiday. As information has been declassified, as confessions have been written or spoken by his associates, and more and more of his life leading up to his murder, a truer picture is painted.

Continue reading
Posted in Commentary on the News, History of Liberty, Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A brief look at recent “news & analysis”

A correspondent has referred us several times to a website “needtoknow.news” produced by G. Edward Griffin. We here at TPOL are unfamiliar with Griffin or his “news” site.

We invite readers to share their impressions of “Need To Know” and both the honesty of its news stories and the rationality of its analysis.

Here are some thoughts on some of their recent postings. Are they honest? Accurate? Many are reposts, especially from the infamous (and now, we understand, bankrupt) Alex Jones, Daily Caller, and other sources. Clearly, some of these sources set off alarm bells. As do the headlines.

Continue reading
Posted in Nathan's Rants | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments