![]() |
05/11/08
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
September
17, 2007
I agree with the 110th Congress Resolution 590 concerning raising the awareness of domestic violence in the United States and the devastating effects domestic violence has on families and communities. The Resolution can be viewed online (here) and then enter HRES 590 in to the search engine block. A critical analysis by Mediaradar of House Resolution 590 is available online. Although the 110th Congress Resolution 590 claims that Congress wants to raise awareness of domestic violence, Resolution 590 accomplishes just the opposite concerning male victimization; i.e.: "Whereas one in four women will experience domestic violence sometime in her life" and "Whereas 13 percent of teenage girls who have been in a relationships report being hit or hurt by their partner." These are just two of many examples of the ignorant or purposeful exclusion of male victimization by Congress. The "one in four claim," is probably from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS) that documents nearly 25 percent of women report their victimization. The Resolution makes no attempt to raise awareness about the fact that NVAWS also documents that 7.6 percent of surveyed men are domestic violence victims. And perhaps Congress is not aware that the NVAWS clearly documents that women are twice as likely to report their victimization as are men. The 13 percent victimization of teenage girls is probably from the Liz Claiborne Inc. Topline Findings Teen Relationship Abuse Survey (Conducted March 2006). On the very same page just above the victimization of girls, the survey documents 17 percent of teenage boys report their victimization. Is the 110th Congress not aware of that data or has Congress chosen to raise awareness of the victimization of our daughters while ignoring the victimization of our sons? Unawareness House Resolution 590 also makes it clear that the 110th Congress ignores or is unaware of a report that Congress asked for, paid for and received: Advancing the Federal Research Agenda on Violence Against Women. Page 48 and 49 documents the victimization of both males and females. Resolution 590 ignores the fact that domestic violence is a problem for both males and females. This above report has been online since 2004 and this report must be read by the members of Congress if Congress intends to become aware of and make others aware of context, circumstances and the multifaceted complexities of domestic violence. Congress also needs to become aware of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) report, Controlling Violence Against Women: A Research Perspective on the 1994 VAWA's Criminal Justice Impacts. This report is online and has been available to the members of Congress since 2002. On page 75 of the above report it notes:
Perhaps Congress is unaware that there are no evaluations in place, no methodological standards and no data that documents mandatory domestic violence policies and practices will not endanger some victims. This admonition has not prevented public policy makers from implementing policies that clearly lack impact evaluation and methodological standards. The members of the Congress also seem to be unaware of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Intimate Partner Violence (IPV): Overview that was available to them online before they sponsored Resolution 590. On the first page of the above CDC report the CDC notes:
Conclusion The lack of awareness in House Resolution 590, documents that Congress should become more aware of domestic violence victimization and that Congress has to begin recognizing the victimization of all of domestic violence victims regardless of age, gender or sexual orientation. As the father of three daughters and two sons I ask; are the Congressional members unaware of male victimization - as House Resolution 590 demonstrates they seem to be - or has Congress simply chosen to exclude or minimize male victimization? (Editor's Note: It would seem obvious that no amount of Congressional reading or research will lead to any real resolution to this situation. The law must be equally applied to everyone, of course, but this problem will only be solved when individuals take full responsibility for themselves and their families. If we look to government to solve our problems, we will still have our problems and lose ever more of our liberty to increasing injustice - for all.)
Richard L. Davis served in the United States Marine Corps from 1960 to 1964. He is a retired lieutenant from the Brockton, Massachusetts police department. He has a graduate degree in liberal arts from Harvard University and a second in criminal justice from Anna Maria College. He is a member of the International Honor Society of Historians and the American Society of Criminology. He is a college instructor for Quincy College at Plymouth, MA in Criminology, Criminal Justice and Domestic Violence. He is the vice president for Family Nonviolence, Inc. in Fairhaven, MA. He is also the vice president for the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women. He is an independent consultant for criminal justice domestic violence policies, procedures, and programs. He is the author of Domestic Violence: Facts and Fallacies by Praeger publishers and has written numerous articles for newspapers, journals, and magazines concerning the issue of domestic violence. He has columns concerning domestic violence at http://www.policeone.com, and http://www.nycop.com, is a distance learner instructor in Introduction to Criminal Justice and Domestic Violence for the Online Police Academy and has a website. He and Kim Eyer have a domestic violence website The Cop and the Survivor. He lives in Plymouth, Massachusetts with his wife and the youngest of five children. He experienced domestic violence professionally for 21 years as a police officer and personally as a child and as an adult. In his retirement he continues to use his education, experience, and training to help the children, women, and men who have had to endure violence from those who profess to love them. He may be reached here. |
Archives Mandatory Arrest and No-Drop Prosecution Primary and Dominant - Aggressor Arrest Policies Liz Claiborne Inc. (Part 1) A Case Study of Deception Liz Claiborne Inc. (Part 2) Power, Control and Emotional Abuse Liz Claiborne Inc. (Part 3) Break The Silence Why the Dating Violence Double Standard? Domestic Violence Awareness Month The Context and Nature of Oppression An Open Letter to the White Ribbon Campaign Complete
Archives for Richard L. Davis
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |