Constitution to Hillary, Obama and McCain.Congress Makes the Laws not the President By Robert Greenslade - Price of Liberty
No human being has the right -- under any circumstances -- to initiate force against another human being, nor to threaten or delegate its initiation. The Zero Aggression Principle
12/02/08
Constitution to Hillary, Obama and McCain:
Congress Makes the Laws not the President
By Robert Greenslade © Nitwit Press


Mission Statement
update 1/20/08
 
Editorial Policy
 
Submissions
 
Letters to the Editor
 
Commentary
on the News
 
Return to Home Page

February 25, 2008

Letters from the Constitution, No. 1.

Dear Senators Clinton, Obama, and McCain:

It has come to my attention that you are running for the office of President of the United States and one of you will be elected to that office in the near future.

During your campaigns, I have heard you list so-called problems the nation is facing and listened to your attacks on the individual holding the office you presently seek for not solving these problems. In speeches and debates you have asserted that if elected, you, as President of the United States, will enact legislation to solve every problem known to mankind. I may be over 220 years old and my text has been ignored and misconstrued over the years, but I do not recall giving the President of the United States any legislative power.

As you know, I established 3 independent branches of government -- legislative, executive, and judicial. My text defines and limits the powers of each branch. If you will consult your copy of me, after removing the dust, you will note, after reviewing Article I, Section 1 that - "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."

The last time I checked, the President is not a member of the legislative branch of government - but you are. That means you, as a member of the Senate, write the laws - not the President. After you and your fellow members of Congress write and pass a law, Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 of my text requires the President to sign or reject (veto) your proposed legislation. I gave you, the Congress, the power to over-ride any presidential veto. Thus, you and your fellow members of Congress have the power to enact legislation without the approval of the President.

Where have you been the past 7 years? Congress, not the President, has the power and duty to enact the legislation that will solve the problems you complain about. Assuming, that is, I vested the federal government with the constitutional authority to legislate in that area. But that is another letter for a different day. I will send it to you very soon.

You will recall that as a condition of becoming a United States Senator, you took an oath to support me and you are bound by that oath pursuant to Article VI of my text. Your distortions of my text to the American people in the name of power shows that your oath was an empty promise.

The people who wrote me viewed virtue and character to be essential components for the office of President of the United States. Your misrepresentations of system of limited government established by me and the power I vest in a President brings your character into serious question. If you are elected to office, you will be required, pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 of my text to - "swear (or affirm) that (you) will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of (your) Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Your constant pandering to the American people in exchange for votes, irrespective of whether the power you discuss is vested in the federal government or the office of the President has me concerned. How can you preserve, protect and defend me, if elected, when you are promising to violate me before ever taking office?

Very Truly Yours,

The Constitution for the United States of America

Some other, related reading:

The Flawed Second Amendment Debate

The Second Amendment and the Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Another Look at the Wording of the Second Amendment

Would the Repeal of the Second Amendment Empower the Federal Government and Negate the Right to Own a Firearm?

Tell me why the States needed the so-called "Collective Right" Second Amendment?

The Second Amendment is an Individual Right

A Question For The Supreme Court

Your comments welcome!

Now Available! See Editor's review here.

"The Bill of Rights Does Not Grant You Any Constitutional Rights"
By Robert Greenslade and Claude Ellsworth

$10.00-includes shipping and any applicable sales tax.

P.S.C.S.
1547 Palos Verdes Mall PMB #160
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Email any questions concerning the book/booklet to Bob at-govtnitwit [at] yahoo.com

Robert Greenslade focuses his writing on issues surrounding the federal government and the Constitution. He believes politicians at the federal level, through ignorance or design, are systematically dismantling the Constitution in an effort to expand their power and consolidate control over the American people. He has dedicated himself to resurrecting the true intent of the Constitution in the hope that the information will contribute, in some small way, to restoring the system of limited government established by the Constitution.

If you are interested in finding out more about the Constitution, take a look at this book. I use it in many of my articles and it is the best book I've found on this subject. Bob

The Federal Government: Its True Nature and Character: Being a Review of Judge Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States.

Reprint of the 1868 edition. ''Perhaps the ablest analysis of the nature and character of the federal government that has ever been published. It has remained unanswered.'' This review of Judge Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States is perhaps the ablest analysis of the nature and character of the Federal Government that has ever been published. It has remained unanswered. Indeed, we are not aware that any attempt has been made to challenge the soundness of its reasoning. The great vise of Judge Story and the Federalists consisted in desiring the clothe the federal government with almost monarchical power, whereas the States had carefully and resolutely reserved the great mass of political power for themselves. The powers which they delegated to the federal government were few, and were general in their character. Those which they reserved embraced their original and inalienable sovereignty, which no state imagined it was surrendering when it adopted the constitution. Mr. Madison dwelt with great force upon the fact that ''a delegated is not a surrendered power.'' The states surrendered no powers to the federal government -- they only delegated them. 160 pages.

Please see the bottom of the page for Bob's book offer.

Archives

The 2004 Declaration of Independence

The Constitution and YOU Part 1

The Constitution and YOU Part 2

The Constitution and YOU Part 3l

Out of Chaos comes Control

"Government of the People, by the People and for the People" -- or Not?

Would the Repeal of the Second Amendment Empower the Federal Government and Negate the Right to Own a Firearm?

Are the Barry Bonds' Record-Setting Baseballs Subject to the Federal Income Tax?

The Constitution did not Abolish the System of Government Established by the Articles of Confederation and Consolidate the States into One Nation

Tell me why the States needed the so-called "Collective Right" Second Amendment?

Rudy Giuliani shows his Ignorance of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment is an Individual Right

A Question For The Supreme Court

The Second Amendment Question before the Supreme Court is Constitutionally Flawed and Dangerous

It's Time To Break Out The Torches And Pitchforks!

Complete Archives for Robert Greenslade