| |
10/07/08
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
April
16, 2007
In
a Town Hall Meeting in Hampton, New Hampshire last week, a woman in the
audience engaged in a heated exchange with presidential hopeful Hillary
Clinton concerning the Senator’s vote to authorize the war in Iraq. When
asked several times if she had read the intelligence report given to her
in 2002, Clinton would not answer the question directly but stated she
had been briefed on its contents. In a classic example of Monday morning
quarterbacking, Clinton stated: “If I had known then what I know now,
I never would have voted to give this President the authority.” Then
the smartest woman in the world inferred that she had been tricked because
she believed she was only giving President Bush the authority to send
United Nations [U.N.] inspectors to Iraq.
The kool aid drinking Clintonites in the audience fell for this blatant lie and voiced their approval by applauding even though the legislation Clinton voted for is entitled: “Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq . Apparently, the aspiring commander in chief does not know the difference between U.N. inspectors and United States Armed Forces. Senator Clinton may be able to mislead her dupes in New Hampshire but there is a bogeyman in her closet whose speech proves she is a blatant liar concerning her latest comments on the war in Iraq. The speech states in part:
The
bogeyman
that made this speech was not the present clown in the White House;
it was Bill Clinton on December 16, 1998.
At the time this speech was made and beyond, Senator Clinton claimed she helped shape domestic and foreign policy during her husband’s presidency. Therefore, she had to be well aware of the situation in Iraq years before her vote in 2002. At the time her husband took this action in 1998, the people in the Clinton Administration, including then self-proclaimed co-president Hillary Clinton, claimed they were foreign policy visionaries. Now, according to Senator Clinton, there were no weapons of mass destruction and the intelligence given to her in 2002 was doctored by the Bush Administration to trick her and other members of Congress into supporting military operations against Iraq. Hopefully, one of her opponents will use this speech to show that Hillary Clinton is nothing but a shameless liar who puts the acquisition of power above the truth. But since most politicians suffer from this same affliction 24/7, don’t count on them exposing her lies anytime soon.
Robert
Greenslade focuses his writing on issues surrounding the federal government
and the Constitution. He believes politicians at the federal level, through
ignorance or design, are systematically dismantling the Constitution in
an effort to expand their power and consolidate control over the American
people. He has dedicated himself to resurrecting the true intent of the
Constitution in the hope that the information will contribute, in some
small way, to restoring the system of limited government established by
the Constitution.
If you are interested in finding out more about the Constitution, take a look at this book. I use it in many of my articles and it is the best book I've found on this subject. Bob Reprint of the 1868 edition. ''Perhaps the ablest analysis of the nature and character of the federal government that has ever been published. It has remained unanswered.'' This review of Judge Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States is perhaps the ablest analysis of the nature and character of the Federal Government that has ever been published. It has remained unanswered. Indeed, we are not aware that any attempt has been made to challenge the soundness of its reasoning. The great vise of Judge Story and the Federalists consisted in desiring the clothe the federal government with almost monarchical power, whereas the States had carefully and resolutely reserved the great mass of political power for themselves. The powers which they delegated to the federal government were few, and were general in their character. Those which they reserved embraced their original and inalienable sovereignty, which no state imagined it was surrendering when it adopted the constitution. Mr. Madison dwelt with great force upon the fact that ''a delegated is not a surrendered power.'' The states surrendered no powers to the federal government -- they only delegated them. 160 pages. |
The ·2004 Declaration of Independence The Constitution and YOU Part 1 The Constitution and YOU Part 2 The Constitution and YOU Part 3 Even God is Engaged in Interstate Commerce The Second Amendment and the Preamble to the Bill of Rights Another Look at the Wording of the Second Amendment Are the Constitutions of the Several States Unconstitutional? Massachusetts' Mandatory Health Insurance Bill Is Unconstitutional No Senator Clinton - Government is the one Squeezing Consumers From the Another Usurpation of Power in the Name of Patriotism Department "Newspapers in Education" needs an Education on the Constitution and Second Amendment If Women have the Right to an Abortion then I have the Right to Own a Firearm Left Wing Socialist wants to make Minutemen Domestic Terrorists A Catch-22 will Stop Plan by Democrats to Pull American Troops out of Iraq Complete Archives for Robert Greenslade
| ||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
