|
September
25, 2006

Libertarian
Commentary on the News, 17 - 23 September 2006
Let's dive right in, with a sad piece of news I missed.
Culture
Wars: Oriana Fallaci RIP
Sept. 15 (Bloomberg)
Oriana Fallaci, the best-selling Italian journalist as renowned for
her diatribes against Islam as her interviews with the political leaders
of the late 20th century, has died. She was 77. Fallaci died late yesterday
in a hospital in Florence where she was being treated for lung cancer,
according to her publicist Paolo Klun. He said she had returned to die
in the city of her birth about 10 days ago. "It was her last act
of love,'' he said.
I missed
this story last week, but readers deserve to know of the loss of this
gallant fighter for freedom - hardly a libertarian, but still a vital
defender of western civilization all her life. She fought the Fascists
and National Socialists in the 30s and 40s, fought Communism in the 50s
and beyond, and fought Islamic hegemonists in the new century. She will
be missed.
Culture
Wars: Pro-life
groups take market approach
Fox News
"Anti-abortion activists say they've got another arrow in their
quiver to use against what they believe is the murder of unborn babies:
A handshake with a real-estate agent. They've discovered that one of the
best ways to shut down an abortion clinic is to buy the building in which
it's located. 'With civil disobedience we might be successful at closing
an abortion clinic for of couple hours a day, but the tactics we're using
now permanently close the abortion clinics,' said Cheryl Sullenger, spokeswoman
for the antiabortion group Operation Rescue. 'It's much more effective,
and we don't have to go to jail and wear handcuffs, so we're liking this
much better.'" [RRND editor's note: This technique has been used
by the right for centuries, since ownership of their property is often
the last thing progressives think about - SAT] (09/18/06)
On the
other hand, ultimately, it is a tactic that will be countered by the abortionists.
But it appears to me to be a legitimate and pro-liberty tool.
Culture
Wars: Religious coalition challenges
federal abortion ban
Raw Story
"An amici curiae brief in Gonzales v. Carhart was filed with the
U.S. Supreme Court early Thursday by the Religious Coalition for Reproductive
Choice (RCRC), urging the court to strike down the first-ever federal
abortion ban on religious grounds. 'The Court's decision in this case
will have enormous consequences for every woman in this country, and for
the men and children who love and depend on them,' said RCRC president
and CEO, Reverend Carlton W. Veazey, in a press release obtained by RAW
STORY. 'This case will determine if the law will continue to protect the
ability of women to choose the safest abortion procedure in cases where
their health is at stake or when their baby has such severe problems that
it will die shortly after birth,' said Veazey." (09/21/06)
It is a
who's who list of liberal religious groups and mainstream religions that
have rejected the foundation of their faith that are found in this effort.
Having decided that human life is worthless, their stand is perfectly
logical from their point of view - and perfectly evil from the point of
view of someone who believes that liberty is the birthright of all humans
(even those who are not yet born).
Our Economy:
Mint - Liberty Dollar competition "a
federal crime"
US Mint Pressroom
"The United States Mint urges consumers considering the purchase
or use of 'Liberty Dollar' medallions, marketed by the National Organization
for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act and the Internal Revenue Code
(NORFED), to be aware that they are not genuine United States Mint bullion
coins, and not legal tender. These medallions are privately produced products
that are neither backed by, nor affiliated with, the United States Government.
Prosecutors with the Department of Justice have determined that the use
of these gold and silver NORFED 'Liberty Dollar' medallions as circulating
money is a Federal crime." [Editor's note: Go pound sand, government
counterfeiters! I'll conduct exchanges using whatever medium I (and those
on the other side of the table) please - TLK] (09/14/06)
This piece
of propaganda will no doubt accomplish what it sets out to do - end or
greatly reduce the growing use of the NORFED specie - but unless the FedGov
once more outlaws private ownership of gold (and adds silver to that ban)
this will continue to be an alternative for many of us. The US Mint plays
exactly the same game as NORFED does in assigning value to their coins
- those that are base metal and those that are precious metal. An example
is the recent rather silly solid gold "Buffalo nickel" the Mint
is producing, with an "actual gold value of $650" (although
based on which market and what day it doesn't say) and selling for $795:
a tidy little piece of seigniorage that dwarfs the NORFED mark-up of an
ounce of silver from $9 commodity price to $10 face value.
Our Economy:
Oil prices drop
Reuters
Oil prices slid to fresh six-month lows on Wednesday on rising winter
fuel stocks and waning concern about Iran, but the world's largest exporter
Saudi Arabia signaled the market may have fallen enough. U.S. crude was
down 86 cents at $60.80 a barrel at 1455 GMT after touching $60.61, the
lowest since March 21. The market was close to erasing gains so far in
2006. Crude closed 2005 at $61.04. Oil has retreated over $17 from its
July record high of $78.40 in its steepest decline for 15 years.
We often
forget that it is NOT (or not just) the "Big Oil" companies
that are making a fortune right now from high prices - the Saudis are
able to fund worldwide jihad better than ever with this windfall. If the
US and other nations can bring new supplies on-line quickly AND get some
more refineries built, the Saudis may find themselves unable to stop the
decline.
Mama's
Note: You can bet that none of the government layers that collect taxes
on oil and oil products are happy with this price decline. They are "losing"
millions every day! They are not apt to allow any new oil sources or refineries
in the country, since that would tend to put downward pressure on the
price.
Watch
for an attempt to stir the pot of fear and reaction so the price goes
back up. Remember that the demand for oil is actually lower in the summer.
The winter heating season is almost upon us, and the demand will go up
again. So will the price.
Our Economy:
Fuel prices continue to drop, may drop more
Reuters
The price U.S. drivers pay for gasoline is expected to drop another
25 cents in the short term to a national average of $2.25 a gallon, the
federal Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday. "Reductions
already seen in spot and futures markets could imply a further decrease
in the U.S. average retail price of as much as 25 cents (to around $2.25
per gallon), if those wholesale markets don't turn upward in the interim,"
the EIA said in its weekly review of the oil market. The national price
for regular unleaded gasoline has already declined 54 cents over the last
six weeks since reaching a summer peak of $3.04 a gallon.
Great!
Got gas for 241.9 at Grand Junction yesterday, and saw (at gasprices.com)
that in parts of Nebraska and eastern South Dakota it is down to under
220! I think it might, just might, drop to under 200 this year! I hope
so. And even in Mama's hometown, there was a 36-cent drop in a single
day! Now, let's work to save money AND fuel and get it back to a nice
smooth 100!
Mama's
Note: The price dropped from #3.059 to $2.499 - just after I filled the
tank, of course. It is still $2.499 here in Newcastle, but I got a tankful
in Sundance Sunday for $2.379/ gal. - a big difference. I suspect that
it is less in Sundance simply because of the interstate highway that goes
through there.
The Coming
Fall of Europe: Germany-
Neo-Nazis capture seats
Independent [UK]
"Neo-Nazis dealt an embarrassing political blow to Germany's Chancellor
Angela Merkel yesterday after winning parliamentary seats in her eastern
home state for the first time since the country's reunification in 1990.
The overtly racist National Democratic Party, won 6.4 per cent of votes
in the Baltic coastal state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, where Mrs. Merkel
has her parliamentary constituency and keeps a holiday home. ... The party
shocked Germany two years ago after obtaining seats in the eastern state
of Saxony for the first time in 36 years." (09/17/06)
How quickly
we forget - Sachsen ("Saxony" in English) hasn't HAD free elections
for 38 years, as the story implies: it was part of the DDR until the reunification
in the early 1990s. And national-socialism has been a deep undercurrent
of German politics since WW2 - and will be as long as socialism remains
a viable alternative for the nation: "Christian Socialist" or
"Social Democrat" or whatever they want to call it - is ultimately
an anti-liberty political position.
The Coming
Fall of Europe: Hungary-
Budapest hit by wave of violence
BBC News [UK]
"Thousands of demonstrators have gathered in the Hungarian capital,
Budapest, demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany.
Police used tear gas and water cannon against a crowd who threw bottles
and stones, and set cars alight. After several hours the police withdrew,
allowing the protesters to break into the state television HQ. The protests
follow Mr. Gyurcsany's admission that his socialist government told lies
to win a general election." (09/18/06)
Evidence
of my claim above that socialism, in whatever guise, is an opponent to
freedom and liberty.
The Coming
Fall of Europe:
UK- Government accused of burying school data
Guardian [UK]
"The government was yesterday accused of burying bad news about
poor primary school test results by releasing the figures on the same
day as improved GCSE results in secondary schools. Special advisers to
Alan Johnson, the education secretary and a possible challenger to Gordon
Brown for the Labour leadership, were said to have overruled communications
staff in the Department for Education and Skills to determine the date
of publication. David Willetts, the shadow education secretary, said email
correspondence showed that civil servants had warned repeatedly that primary
school figures should not be released on the same day as GCSE results.
The primary school figures were published at exactly the same time --
9.30am on August 24 -- as the GCSE results, a change from previous years
when they were released on separate days. The primary school figures revealed
falling standards in reading, writing and maths among seven-year-olds
and missed targets for 11-year-olds." (09/18/06)
While I
can sympathize emotionally with the frustration of these bureaucrats -
no matter what they did they would have been wrong - I can't help but
be glad that they are getting lambasted about this: government-run, tax-funded
schools don't work well ANYPLACE, not just in the USA.
The Coming
Fall of Europe: UK- Big Brother is
shouting at you
Daily Mail [UK]
"Big Brother is not only watching you -- now he's barking orders
too. Britain's first 'talking' CCTV cameras have arrived, publicly berating
bad behaviour and shaming offenders into acting more responsibly. The
system allows control room operators who spot any antisocial acts -- from
dropping litter to late-night brawls -- to send out a verbal warning:
'We are watching you.' Middlesbrough has fitted loudspeakers on seven
of its 158 cameras in an experiment already being hailed as a success."
(09/16/06)
This just
makes me sick to my stomach.
GUVMINT-RUINED,
THEFT-FUNDED SCHOOLS: Judge
blocks Omaha school segregation law
MSNBC
"A judge on Monday blocked the implementation of a law that would
divide the Omaha school district into three racially identifiable districts.
The law, passed in April and set to take effect in 2008, would have split
the Omaha Public Schools into one mostly black district, one largely Hispanic
and one predominantly white. It also would have forced 11 school districts
in two counties to share resources, including state funding, as part of
a 'learning community.'" (09/18/06)
This kind
of mess should win more people to the "radical" idea of separation
of school and state.
GUVMINT-RUINED,
THEFT-FUNDED SCHOOLS: CA-
Angry parent subdued by police
KCRA News
"Two Sutter Creek schools were locked down for about 45 minutes
Tuesday morning because of an incident involving an angry parent, school
district officials said. Amador High School and Sutter Creek Elementary
School were locked down. The schools are adjacent to one another. Authorities
said a father came to the high school campus angry after being notified
that Child Protective Services wanted to interview his two children as
part of an investigation into alleged spousal abuse at the home. The parent
had to be subdued by officers from the Sutter Creek and Ione police departments.
He did not have a weapon." (09/19/06)
Sounds
like a lot of overreaction on the part of the schools and the cops.
GUVMINT-RUINED,
THEFT-FUNDED SCHOOLS: Why women outnumber
men in college
Arizona Republic
"Here's a closer look at why a growing majority of college students
are women: Women without a degree earn much less on average than men,
about $18,600 a year compared with men's $30,300, according to the U.S.
Census Bureau. While men can get higher-paying jobs driving forklifts
or working construction right out of high school, women's opportunities
tend to be more limited. They are more likely to work minimum-wage service
jobs, often without health benefits, said Jacqueline King, author of a
2006 study, 'Gender Equity in Higher Education.' For these reasons, the
desire to boost income likely accounts for some of women's increased enrollment
in college, she said." (09/16/06)
This silly
little study is an exercise in foolishness. Maybe I'm too much a westerner,
but I've seen no problem with women getting jobs driving forklifts or
swinging a hammer - assuming that they want a job like that. Many do not
- just as many men do not. (I have seen women (and men) give up very good
paying jobs requiring CDLs (commercial drivers licenses) to accept jobs
as waitresses/waiters for personal reasons having nothing to do with "lack
of opportunity.") Any study which does not take into account the
increasingly hostile political climate in many institutions of higher
education, especially public ones, is probably missing the mark.
GW-STOOPID
GUVMINT TROUR IMPERIAL COURTS OF INJUSTICE: CA-
Governator receives two new warming bills
San Francisco Chronicle
"After cutting a deal with Democrats on historic legislation to
cap greenhouse gas emissions in California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
faces decisions this month on two other bills that could dramatically
reduce pollution from the auto and energy industries -- the state's two
largest contributors to global warming. With much less fanfare than for
the global warming bill, which Schwarzenegger is expected to sign next
Wednesday, Democratic majorities in the state Senate and Assembly approved
legislation that would require half of the cars sold in the state to run
on alternative fuels by 2020 and another bill that would prohibit California
utilities from buying electricity generated by high-polluting power plants
in other states." [Editor's note: And then when the blackouts
start again, they'll blame the evil utilities, not their own prohibition
on buying the juice, of course - TLK] (09/21/06)
As stupid
an act as Branson's (story elsewhere here) but in this case, it is government
using its coercive power to force virtually every taxpayer in California
to waste their own money, not a billionaire frittering away his fortune.
Mama's
Note: Ask me again if I'm glad to have escaped from California! I live
in an all electric home here in Wyoming, yet my monthly bill all summer
was about $35. It will be higher in the winter, of course, and I have
wood heat as well. But my average electric bill in California the last
few years was seldom below $100. and I heated with GAS. Get out now, folks,
while you still can.
GW-STOOPID
GUVMINT TROUR IMPERIAL COURTS OF INJUSTICE: CA-
State sues carmakers for global warming
San Jose Mercury News
"California filed a lawsuit against the six largest automakers
operating in the United States, contending that car and truck emissions
are causing global warming, injuring the state's environment, economy
and endangering public health. The complaint, filed Wednesday in U.S.
District Court in Oakland, is the latest escalation in an ongoing clash
between states and the U.S. auto industry over global warming. The California
complaint contends that under federal and state common law the automakers
have created a public nuisance by producing millions of vehicles that
collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide." (09/21/06)
Right in
line with the Swartzennegger SGT in the last article, and just like the
various antigun lawsuits, this clearly reveals the abuse of the excessive
power that governments have. California's economy is, in very large part,
a creation of the automobile culture and therefore the industry - this
is like suing your mother because she DIDN'T abort you.
GW-STOOPID
PEEPLES TROUR IMPERIAL COURTS OF INJUSTICE: Branson
pledges $3 billion to fight global warming
Fox News
"British billionaire Richard Branson on Thursday committed to
spending all the profits from his airline and rail businesses -- an estimated
$3 billion over the next 10 years -- on combating global warming. The
Virgin Group chairman said the money would be spent on renewable energy
initiatives within his company and on investments in bio-fuel research,
development, production and distribution, as well as projects to tackle
emissions contributing to global warming. 'We have to wean ourselves off
our dependence on coal and fossil fuels. Our generation has the knowledge,
it has the financial resources and as importantly it has the will power
to do so,' the flamboyant 56-year-old British entrepreneur said. Branson,
who has a knighthood and is known as much for his daredevil stunts as
his business, unveiled his plan at a news conference at the Clinton Global
Initiative, a summit run by former U.S. President Bill Clinton to combat
world problems." (09/21/06)
Yeah, it
is his money (or his and his stockholders), but what a waste. Of course,
look who is rooting him on.
THE HOME
FRONT: Grassroots
Opposition to Big Brother Farm Program
World Net Daily
In an effort to quiet the growing opposition, the USDA released a publication
last April stressing that the NAIS is "voluntary." But when
pressed by reporters, Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns said the USDA
had the authority to make the program mandatory if there was less than
100 percent voluntary participation. Originally, the NAIS consisted of
three elements: 1) premises registration by 2007, 2) animal registration
by 2008, and 3) reporting any movement of livestock off a registered premises
by 2009. Grassroots opposition has disrupted this schedule. Wisconsin
and Indiana have already enacted state laws mandating premises registration,
and several other states are considering similar legislation. The Talent-Emerson
bills would prohibit federal funding for these programs, and the future
of state programs is now in question.
This folly
is finally being fought in the way it should have been for several years.
Mama's
Note: As with "the war on drugs," gun "registration,"
and bans of all kinds, people have to look honestly at the RESULTS, even
if they are not truly interested in individual liberty. The criminals
and careless operators will not submit to the NAIS rules, and a vigorous
black market will develop. The end results will be LESS food safety and
FAR GREATER cost for everyone in every imaginable way. Government control
is NOT the answer, it IS the PROBLEM.
THE HOME
FRONT: Armed man crashes Capitol, arrested
Alpena News
"An armed man ran through the U.S. Capitol after crashing his
vehicle on the Capitol grounds Monday in the worst breach of security
since a gunman killed two police officers in 1998. Acting Capitol Police
Chief Christopher McGaffin identified the intruder as Carlos Greene, 20,
of Silver Spring, Md. He said Greene, tackled after a foot chase through
the Capitol, was armed with a loaded handgun and had crack cocaine in
his possession." (09/18/06)
A nut case?
Or someone who got tagged as a druggie AFTER the fact to make it easier
to send him up the river? Or an agent provocateur, as we seem to see so
often today?
Mama's
Note: I'll vote for the last one. Anyone with the brains of a peanut should
avoid the US Capitol with so much as an aspirin in his pocket, let alone
a self-defense tool - or nail clippers! The entire area needs demolition
and decontamination before human beings will ever be safe there again.
(Mega-sigh...)
THE HOME
FRONT: Senate to consider
border fence
San Gabriel Valley Tribune
"With the congressional session barreling to a close and politicians
eager to hit the campaign trail, Republicans moved with new determination
Tuesday to seal off the U.S. border and impose strict new immigration
controls. The Senate is expected to consider as early as today legislation
that would stretch 700 miles of fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. And
while key Democrats said they will try to attach provisions that would
legalize undocumented immigrants, they vowed not to try to block the bill
if Republicans force it to the floor without amendments. If the Senate
approves the bill, it will go to President Bush for his signature."
(09/20/06)
Let me
start by saying that I strongly disagree with those who instantly class
any sort of a border fence as being a "Berlin Wall" - the comparison
is ludicrous: different purpose, different method, different in virtually
everything. That said, I believe that good fences DO make good neighbors,
whether we are talking about 1/4-acre lots, 3-acre lots, 4000-acre ranches,
or countries. If I wish to keep people off my property, my property rights
trump their right to free and open travel. I can and do show my support
of open travel by allowing people to cross my land to get to their land,
or to get to their friend's land, but they do it on MY terms - not on
their own. On a national scale, there IS a place for border crossings,
and it is NOT anti-liberty or unreasonable to tell people that they have
to come through my front door and not a window, the roof, or a hole in
the wall that shouldn't be there.
Yet, I
do have a moral obligation NOT to impede free travel, even across borders,
even if there is some small chance of inconvenience, or even a remote
chance of harm to me and mine. When I show hospitality to a stranger,
there is always a chance that I have invited a viper into my bosom, and
it is reasonable and moral to take precautions against that, and my hospitality
does NOT have to extend to those who threaten to do harm to me, whether
it is stealing from me, conning me, attacking me, or plotting to steal
something from me. Again, that said, a good fence HAS to be coupled with
a good policy allowing for freedom of travel and other human rights. Congress
is unlikely to do that, making this attempt yet another in a long line
of foolish and farcical acts - pure posturing that does not address the
real problems.
THE HOME
FRONT: Hole in proposed border fence?
New York Times
"If the [border] fence is built, however, it could have a long
gap - about 75 miles - at one of the border's most vulnerable points because
of opposition from the Indian tribe here. More illegal immigrants are
caught - and die trying to cross into the United States - in and around
the Tohono O'odham Indian territory, which straddles the Arizona border,
than any other spot in the state. Tribal leaders have cooperated with
Border Patrol enforcement, but they promised to fight the building of
a fence out of environmental and cultural concerns. For the Tohono O'odham,
which means "desert people," the reason is fairly simple. For
generations, their people and the wildlife they revere have freely crossed
the border. For years, an existing four-foot-high cattle fence has had
several openings - essentially cattle gates - that tribal members use
to visit relatives and friends, take children to school and perform rites
on the other side."
The Tohono
O'odham (better known by their English name, Papago) are the people that
should have the say - if they are willing to extend hospitality to the
wetbacks passing though their country. However, the article goes on to
describe the increasing problem that the Tohono O'odham have with these
travelers robbing and abusing their unwilling hosts.
THE HOME
FRONT: Gonzales wants Internet records
saved
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
"Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Tuesday that Congress
should require Internet providers to preserve customer records, asserting
that prosecutors need them to fight child pornography. Gonzales and FBI
Director Robert Mueller have met with several Internet providers, including
Time Warner Inc.'s AOL, Comcast Corp., Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and
Verizon Communications Inc. ... Testifying to a Senate panel, Gonzales
acknowledged the concerns of some company executives who say legislation
might be overly intrusive and encroach on customers' privacy rights. But
he said the growing threat of child pornography over the Internet was
too great." (09/19/06)
"It's
for the children" is one of those top-ten lies used for the taking
of liberty and for the expansion of government. There is no evidence of
there being any "growing threat" associated with child porn
(which is a nasty business, admittedly, WHEN it is properly defined -
which it usually is NOT in 21st Century America) and no evidence that
violating people's and company's privacy would do anything effective to
combat it - or that ANYTHING government can do to combat it will really
make a bit of difference.
THE HOME
FRONT: Pentagon- Secret unit couldn't
stop 9/11
Winston-Salem Journal
"A Pentagon report rejects the idea that intelligence gathered
by a secret military unit could have been used to stop the Sept. 11 hijackings.
The Pentagon inspector general's office said Thursday that a review of
records from the unit, known as Able Danger, found no evidence it had
identified ringleader Mohamed Atta or any other terrorist who participated
in the 2001 attacks." (09/21/06)
This claim
has attained the status of an urban legend, but few people are going to
believe this latest Pentagon report is anything but an attempt to cover
up.
THE HOME
FRONT: States say new IDs could cost
billions
Anderson Herald Bulletin
"New federal security rules for issuing driver's licenses could
cost $11 billion to implement, raising concerns among states about paying
for the changes, according to a national survey of states released Thursday.
'There's no question that state legislators believe driver's licenses
should be as secure as is possible,' said William Pound, executive director
of the National Conference of State Legislatures which helped conduct
the survey. 'The $11 billion question is, 'Who's going to pay for it?'"
(09/21/06)
While I
don't mind using every tool at hand to fight tyrannical enactments like
this, concentrating just on costs and cost-benefit ratios while ignoring
the essential truth that this is an attack on a basic human liberty is
foolish and ultimately self-defeating, since we all know that the taxpayer
ultimately foots the bill, paying for tyranny's tools.
THE HOME
FRONT: GA-
Immigration raids on residents
Yahoo! News
"Trailer parks lie abandoned. The poultry plant is scrambling
to replace more than half its workforce. Business has dried up at stores
where Mexican laborers once lined up to buy food, beer and cigarettes
just weeks ago. This Georgia community of about 1,000 people has become
little more than a ghost town since Sept. 1, when federal agents began
rounding up illegal immigrants. ... More than 120 illegal immigrants have
been loaded onto buses bound for immigration courts in Atlanta, 189 miles
away. Hundreds more fled Emanuel County. Residents say many scattered
into the woods, camping out for days. ... Federal agents also swarmed
into a trailer park operated by David Robinson. Illegal immigrants were
handcuffed and taken away. Almost none have returned. Robinson bought
an American flag and posted it by the pond out front -- upside down, in
protest. ... Crider President David Purtle said the agents began inspecting
the company's employment records in May. They found 700 suspected illegal
immigrants, and supervisors handed out letters over the summer ordering
them to prove they came to the U.S. legally or be fired. Only about 100
kept their jobs. The arrests started at the plant Sept. 1. Over the Labor
Day weekend, agents with guns and bulletproof vests converged on workers'
homes after getting the addresses from Crider's files." (09/15/06)
Compare
this to the raid at Buckley AFB in Colorado in the next story.
THE HOME
FRONT: Illegal immigrants
building gov't projects
Denver Post
Buckley Air Force Base - Black-clad federal immigration agents surrounded
a military housing construction site at sunrise Wednesday and arrested
120 illegal workers from Mexico and Central America within a mile of top-secret
global surveillance and missile early-warning facilities. This was a matter
of national security, federal agents said, because only a fence separated
the unauthorized immigrants from a crucial military listening post. The
immigration raid ranked among the biggest in state history. Federal agents
loaded most of the workers onto buses bound for the U.S.-Mexico border
for deportation, and supervisors vowed to hold military contractors who
employed the workers accountable.
Gee, you
think this might be a problem?
Mama's
Note: I'd like to hear someone explain how rounding up and destroying
the lives of these people has anything to do with stopping those who would
rob, vandalize and otherwise harm others. The people who want to work
and live quietly are in the vast majority, but they are invariably the
ones damaged by all of this "enforcement" the most, not the
violent or destructive. Why not concentrate on those who harm others and
leave everyone else alone?
THE HOME
FRONT: Economists- Illegals have little
impact on prices
Seattle Times
"More than 7 million illegal immigrants work in the United States.
They build houses, pick crops, slaughter cattle, stitch clothes, mow lawns,
clean hotel rooms, cook restaurant meals and wash the dishes that come
back. You might assume that the plentiful supply of low-wage illegal workers
would translate into significantly lower prices for the goods and services
they produce. In fact, their impact on consumer prices -- call it the
'illegal-worker discount' -- is surprisingly small. The bag of Washington
state apples you bought last weekend? Probably a few cents cheaper than
it otherwise would have been, economists estimate. That steak dinner at
a downtown restaurant? Maybe a buck off. ... The underlying reason, economists
say, is that for most goods the labor -- whether legal or illegal, native-
or foreign-born -- represents only a sliver of the retail price."
[Editor's note: I don't know about you, but a few cents per item of
produce or a buck either way on a restaurant dinner aren't chump change
to me, even assuming that the economists are considering all of the relevant
variables - TLK] (09/19/06)
Tom's comments
hit home with me - I get angry with the various phone companies every
time I hear the stupid busy recording "for a nominal fee of ninety-five
cents" - sorry, I'm no depression baby, but $0.95 is not "nominal"
to me - it is often the price of a meal, and 10 miles of freedom (1/3
the price of gasoline, currently, at 30 mpg). Still, the point can be
made that cheap labor does NOT result in cheap prices - and the other
costs associated are often far higher.
Mama's
Note: Cheaper prices make all of our lives better, especially the poor
among us. I suspect that the "other costs" are all due to the
welfare state and would vanish easily if they were eliminated. Then the
price of everything could fall while the quality of our lives would be
improved. Just think of the standard of living for all of those willing
to work, if they were not robbed blind to pay for welfare!!
OUR IMPERIAL
COURTS OF INJUSTICE: FL - Judge scolded
for ethics violations
Modesto Bee
"A judge who admitted to 14 ethics violations, including unconstitutionally
ordering a probationer to go to church, was scolded Monday by the Florida
Supreme Court. 'Your behavior is unacceptable,' Chief Justice R. Fred
Lewis told the accused, Circuit Judge Richard Albritton Jr. 'It's a stain
on all of us.'" (09/18/06)
Gee - it
must be a pretty bad stain, considering all the ones the other judges
in Florida have - they never saw a freedom they didn't want to steal,
a life they didn't want to "save," or a dollar they didn't want
in their own pocket.
Mama's
Note: Guess they'll have to quit mandating that drunks join AA...
OUR IMPERIAL
COURTS OF INJUSTICE: Clinton
theft continues
Denver Post
A federal judge today reinstated the "Roadless Rule," a Clinton-era
ban on road construction in nearly a third of national forests. U.S. District
Judge Elizabeth Laporte ruled that the Bush administration failed to conduct
necessary environmental studies before making changes that allowed states
to decide how to manage individual national forests. The 2001 rule prohibits
logging, mining and other development on 58.5 million acres in 38 states
and Puerto Rico, but the Bush administration replaced it in May 2005 with
a process that required governors to petition the federal government to
protect national forests in their states.
This allows
a long-standing theft by government to continue once more unabated. It
also ignores the authority of states to control what goes on inside their
borders - but what's new?
OUR IMPERIAL
COURTS OF INJUSTICE: CA- Reporters
to be jailed for protecting source
MSNBC
"Two San Francisco Chronicle reporters were ordered jailed Thursday
for a maximum 18 months, pending an appeal, for refusing to testify about
who leaked them secret grand jury testimony from Barry Bonds and other
elite athletes. Lance Williams and Mark Fainaru-Wada published a series
of articles and a book based partly on the leaked transcripts of the testimony
of Bonds, Jason Giambi and others before a grand jury investigating the
Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, a Burlingame-based nutritional supplement
company exposed as a steroid ring two years ago." (09/21/06)
Either
a liberty exists, or it does not; clearly in the eyes of this particular
black-robed tyrant, freedom of the press does NOT exist. I'm sure the
9th Circuit Court (see the next article) would agree.
OUR IMPERIAL
COURTS OF INJUSTICE: 9th Circuit repeals
1st Amendment
Wichita Eagle
"Government libraries can block religious groups from worshipping
in public meeting rooms, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday. The
decision came from a case involving the Faith Center Church Evangelistic
Ministries, a Christian group which won a court order allowing them to
hold a 'prayer, praise and worship' service in meeting rooms open to other
groups at a Contra Costa County library branch. A federal judge said it
had a First Amendment right of religion to use the public's facilities.
But a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned
that ruling in a 2-1 decision. 'Prohibiting Faith Center's religious worship
services from the Antioch meeting room is a permissible exclusion of a
category of speech,' Judge Richard Paez ruled." (09/20/06)
I've always
subscribed to a theory of "organizational personality" and clearly
the 9th Circuit Court is a hideous example of that theory: the 9th never
met a liberty that it couldn't abolish, a freedom that it couldn't warp
into meaningless privilege, a government power that it couldn't enhance.
Mama's
Note: The obvious answer is to abolish "government property"
altogether. Private property can be used for whatever the owner wishes...
or should.
MAINSTREAM
MEDIA FOLLIES: Iraq - US abducts, holds
AP photographer
Hickory Daily Record
"The U.S. military in Iraq has imprisoned an Associated Press
photographer for five months, accusing him of being a security threat
but never filing charges or permitting a public hearing. Military officials
said Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi citizen, was being held for 'imperative reasons
of security' under United Nations resolutions. AP executives said the
news cooperative's review of Hussein's work did not find anything to indicate
inappropriate contact with insurgents, and any evidence against him should
be brought to the Iraqi criminal justice system." (09/17/06)
Well, I
am sure that it will surprise (and shock!) my readers to discover that
the Mainstream Media, even the soi-distant Hickory Daily Record, is flat-out
lying about this guy. First, it was known within HOURS that this man had
been arrested in an insurgent safehouse surrounded by known and wanted
insurgents and all kinds of weapons - and AP knew about it in April, refused
to comment on it to other news services in April and May, and did NOT
suddenly "discover" that this Iraqi was held - as are most,
without charges - as a prisoner. You don't hold "public hearings"
or file "charges" against enemy soldiers captured in battle
or anywhere near the battle!
Mama's
Note: Well, this is not a real (declared and just) "war," and
the lines between civilians and "soldiers" is blurred at best.
The tendency of the media to lie and sensationalize everything is certainly
no help, but the situation is not at all clear, even when that is understood.
The fact that the government lies about everything and engages in propaganda
constantly is certainly no incentive to believe any of them about anything.
A pox on all their houses.
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES-Afghanistan: NATO hails
Afghan offensive as "success"
Elmira Star-Gazette
"NATO said Sunday that its two-week offensive in south Afghanistan
was a 'significant success' that had driven Taliban insurgents from their
positions and opened the way for development. But violence was unabated,
with suicide bombers killing two civilians and wounding six soldiers.
Militants also took control of a district in the west of the country after
chasing away the police, an official said, in an apparent attempt to open
a new front." (09/17/06)
My grandmother
would call this "whistling in the dark." At the same time, continued
violence does not mean that they aren't right: consider a similar pronouncement
about the success of the D-Day invasion in 1944 being pooh-poohed because
"the Nazis still occupy Norway, Denmark, Holland and Belgium and
yet you, General Eisenhower, claim that Normandy is a 'significant success.'"
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES: Iran's president
says Bush pushing for war
MSNBC
"President Bush's policies in the Middle East are 'moving the
world toward war,' Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday,
maintaining that Iran was a peaceful nation that merely wanted to be left
alone to 'stand on its [own] feet.' 'The U.S. government thinks that it's
still the period after World War II,' Ahmadinejad said in an interview
with Brian Williams, anchor and managing editor of 'NBC Nightly News,'
a mindset that led Bush to believe that he 'can rule, therefore, over
the rest of the world.'" (09/19/06)
Which mindset
is better - Bush's "rule the world" one or Ahmadinajad's Iranian
"win the world for Allah with a sword" one? Thank you, I don't
think I'll take either one, especially not since neither of them can be
bothered to tell the truth: Iran is no more "peaceful" and "wanting
to be left alone" than the US or China.
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES-IRAQ: Over
20,000 American Troops Injured In Iraq
Space War. Com
The trends in U.S. casualties suffered in Iraq through August continued
into September. The rate at which U.S. troops were being killed continued
to slowly fall, but the rate at which injuries were suffered, including
serious ones, continued to rise. And since the beginning of this month,
U.S. Casualties in the war have passed another grim benchmark: More than
20,000 U.S. Troops have now been wounded while serving in Iraq.
It is not
that modern combat is any less lethal - it is that our ability to save
lives has greatly increased (thanks in large part to the trauma centers
of major American urban areas dealing with automobile accidents). And
in the nature of IED and rockets and missiles, wounding is more likely
to be moderate in the first.
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES-Iraq: Sunnis reject
federation, big attack
LA Daily News
"A series of attacks -- including two suicide car bombings --
in the northern city of Kirkuk Sunday killed 24 people and wounded dozens,
police said. In political developments, Iraq's second-largest Sunni Arab
party rejected a proposed bill that would pave the way for Iraq to become
a federated nation, saying it would divide the country." (09/17/06)
Duh! That
is the entire idea - if each of Iraq's factions can enjoy the same degree
of autonomy as the different ethnic/linguistic communities in Switzerland,
there might be hope for the country.
Mama's
Note: But, but, some of them would have to give up power over the others,
and few political entities can tolerate that at all! Far better to have
them all go on killing each other endlessly than to chance that nasty
"peace" breaking out to spoil the lovely central government
plans. Oh no, not going to happen.
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES-Iraq: Chief judge replaced
in Saddam trial
USA Today
"The chief judge in Saddam Hussein's genocide trial has been replaced,
the Iraqi government spokesman's office confirmed Tuesday. There was no
immediate word on who would take over from Judge Abdullah al-Amiri. The
government spokesman's office confirmed the change without giving details.
The Arab television stations Al-Arabiya and Al-Jazeera said al-Amiri was
replaced at the request of the Iraqi prime minister. Prosecutors had asked
for al-Amiri to be replaced after he allowed Saddam to lash out at Kurdish
witnesses." (09/19/06)
No, the
accused's rights do NOT include the right to threaten or attack, physically
or verbally, a witness. Is this reason to replace the judge? Perhaps.
Sadly the real problem here is that Saddam is being tried by a very, very
flawed system of "Islamic Justice" (certainly in the running
for being an oxymoron - much more so than the American system of either
military OR civilian justice) that will likely not render a good and proper
judgment on a mass murderer and thug.
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES-Iraq: General - US may
boost forces in Iraq
Fremont Tribune
"The U.S. military is likely to maintain and may even increase
its force of more than 140,000 troops in Iraq through next spring, the
top American commander in the region said Tuesday in one of the gloomiest
assessments yet of when troops may come home. Gen. John Abizaid, commander
of the U.S. Central Command, said military leaders would consider adding
troops or extending the Iraq deployments of other units if needed. Until
sectarian violence spiked early this year, Bush administration officials
had voiced hopes that this election year would see significant U.S. troop
reductions in what has become a widely unpopular war." (09/19/06)
This is
an almost immediate turnaround from what was said earlier in the week.
MIDDLE
EAST TARBABIES: Pakistan leader says
US made threats
Mansfield News Journal
"President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan says the United States
threatened to bomb his country back to the Stone Age after the 9-11 attacks
if he did not help America's war on terror. Musharraf says the threat
was delivered by Richard Armitage, then the deputy secretary of state,
to Musharraf's intelligence director, the Pakistani leader told CBS-TV's
60 Minutes." (09/21/06)
Sounds
about right -and a good many people certainly wish both Pakistan and Saudi
Arabia had enjoyed this sort of attention. "If you are not for me,
you are against me" only works if you are able to tell who really
is for you.
North American
Union: Mexico
- Obrador creates "parallel government"
Independent [UK]
"The uncertainty over Mexico's political future has taken a new
twist after supporters of the defeated presidential candidate elected
him to lead a 'parallel' government that will spend the next six years
opposing the man who won the election. By a show of hands, hundreds of
thousands of supporters of Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador voted for the former
mayor of Mexico City to head the alternative government that will oppose
the administration of the president-elect, Felipe Calderon. Suitably enough,
the vote was taken in the central plaza, or Zocalo, which has been home
to his campaign for many months." (09/18/06)
This was
heralded for weeks, and has now indeed come to pass - one more big step
towards Civil War.
Mama's
Note: What Mexico doesn't need is ANOTHER socialist government, but maybe
this will provide new entertainment for the folks who hate "illegal"
immigrants. They'll have a LOT more "immigrants" to hate just
as soon as this war heats up. War of any kind is bad for the economy,
and the economy of Mexico has been very bad for a long time... sort of
why all those folks want to come north in the first place! And good luck
trying to "deport" thousands of people into a war zone. The
US border states only THOUGHT they had problems before.
The 2006
Political Campaigns: Dems pin hopes
on candidate who's no liberal
San Francisco Chronicle
"To win back the Senate in November, Democrats need a victory
here by a candidate who voted for the war in Iraq, opposes same-sex marriage,
backed a ban on a form of late-term abortion, wants to cut the estate
tax and would allow prayer in schools. Rep. Harold Ford Jr., a 36-year-old
Memphis, Tenn. Democrat and charismatic black politician who has been
compared to a young Bill Clinton, is a far cry from Nancy Pelosi -- in
fact, he challenged her for minority leader in 2002, claiming the San
Francisco congresswoman was too liberal. But Democrats nationwide now
see Ford as a candidate who offers a prime opportunity for the party to
win one of six seats they need to regain control of the Senate. Recent
polls show Ford running even with Republican Bob Corker in the race to
succeed Senate GOP Leader Bill Frist." [Editor's note: They also
have as his competitor one of the more troglodytic GOP opponents since
Strom and Jesse passed on, so Ford is indeed the "more liberal"
of the two - SAT] (09/17/06)
Of course,
Harold Ford is a thug and the relative of thugs - hmm, just like Bill
Clinton, eh? (Although I don't know if he is also married to a thug.)
Charismatic he may be, but his stench is every bit as foul as any that
Hugo Chavez claims that W has: corrupt, nepotistic, power- and money-hungry,
and just plain no good.
The 2006
Political Campaigns: CA- Church may
fight IRS summons
Los Angeles Times
"A liberal Pasadena church facing an IRS investigation over alleged
politicking sounded a defiant note Sunday, with its leaders and many congregants
saying the probe amounted to an assault on their constitutional rights
and that they were inclined to defy the agency's request for documents.
'These people are offended,' said the Rev. Ed Bacon, rector of All Saints
Episcopal Church, after delivering an impassioned sermon about the investigation
to a standing-room-only crowd of about 900. 'Freedom of speech and freedom
of religion have been assaulted by this act of the IRS, and I think my
people want to be heard in court.'" (09/18/06)
Oh? The
liberals fighting for the right for religions to "interfere"
in government? Shocking! Seriously, conservative religious groups need
to support this church in its fight, to the bitter end, because ultimately,
the IRS doesn't care what your political views are - just that they want
the money.
Mama's
Note: I suspect that people who wish to belong to and support these large
organizations will continue to be targets in this mini civil war. The
obvious answer seems to be to eliminate the tax status altogether and
leave everyone alone to their own politics as well as their religion.
Those who don't want to pay the taxes can certainly meet with like minded
people in homes and save the overhead as well. A 10 million dollar cathedral
is not necessary to do the work of the Lord... and might well be counterproductive
in more ways than one.
The 2006
Political Campaigns: Democrats - Medicare
drug program bewildering, costly
CNN
"Democrats say failed Republican policies are behind rising Medicare
premiums that are leaving millions of older Americans scrambling for basic
health care. Democrat Chris Murphy, a Connecticut state senator who is
challenging 12-term Republican Rep. Nancy Johnson, criticized the GOP
for failing to embrace the reforms needed to give seniors a break from
increased health care costs." (09/17/06)
Doesn't
this smell just a bit hypocritical? After all, the Demos had a tremendous
amount of influence over this legislation and came up with the twisted
program in the first place.
Mama's
Note: Too bad more people don't realize that the high costs are the result
of government interventions in the first place. The more they give some
people "a break," the more the whole thing will cost everyone
- and the poorer the health care. Good professionals are leaving medicine
in droves. Eventually, real care won't be available at any price until
government is removed from the equation.
The 2006
Political Campaigns: AZ - Elections
a test for US debate
Arizona Republic
"Two hotly contested races for Congress in Arizona are shaping
up to be a referendum on how to curb illegal immigration. Immigration
alone won't determine the winners in the Valley district now represented
by Republican J.D. Hayworth and the one in southern Arizona where GOP
Congressman Jim Kolbe is retiring. But the Republican candidates in each
race are pushing tough immigration reform heavily while Democrats take
a more moderate stance. Coming from a state greatly affected by illegal
immigration, Arizona's choices could influence efforts to reconcile competing
immigration measures passed by the House and Senate. If immigration does
give a victory to the GOP hard-liners, it would be the first time a get-tough
approach has been such a powerful force in a federal election, a Washington,
D.C.-based policy analyst says." (09/21/06)
Immigration
policy has been made into a partisan tool, thanks to the efforts of both
the GOP and the Democratic Party, and so this fits more into the category
of self-fulfilling prophesy than a true prediction. Nationally, the idea
that Arizona can set the policy for the entire nation is as silly as saying
that national presidential elections are dictated by early primaries in
tiny little states like New Hampshire. Silly - but sadly true.
The 2006
Political Campaigns: Boston- Precincts
uncounted in Senate race
Boston Globe
"The Boston Election Department said yesterday that poll workers
inadvertently failed to count the write-in votes in eight city precincts
in Tuesday's primary, the latest embarrassment for an agency under federal
oversight to make sure voters with limited English skills are not improperly
coerced and have enough election information. Late yesterday afternoon,
a Suffolk Superior Court judge ordered that all 2,500-plus ballots from
those eight precincts be unsealed and all write-in votes be counted today
at City Hall to determine the winner of the state Senate race between
incumbent Dianne Wilkerson and challenger Sonia Chang-Diaz."
(09/21/06)
Doesn't
this smell fishy? "Inadvertently" failed to do a basic part
of their job in EIGHT precincts? I also like their legal hairsplitting:
there is apparently "improper" coercion, which implies that
there is "proper" coercion which IS allowed? Ah, the delights
of votin' in a new massa are so many!
More
News and Commentary Page 2 -- Our right to defend ourselves
and other good stuff.

Nathan
Barton is writing this from a wonderful place in the West, which might
be in the Black Hills of South Dakota or Wyoming, or might be in one of
the Four Corners States. Exactly where it is, the breezes blow with the
scent of liberty, and the sound of the pines or the pinions is the sound
of freedom. For thousands of years, people have fought and died for the
liberty that Americans in the great spaces of the West enjoy, and he writes
these commentaries in the hopes that continued generations will be able
to do so, until the end of Time.
Be sure
to visit my blog, Liberty's
Outpost.
Special
Feature! Add your signature to the NEW
Declaration of Independence
By Robert Greenslade
Several
people have asked about buying Gadsden Flags (the rattlesnake "Don't
Tread on Me flags used by the June 23d Movement and other Property Rights
Organizations: you
can get them for $10.00 plus shipping here.

To Read
previous Commentaries, go
to the archives page and click onto the link for the week. The commentaries
are linked from the weekly front pages.

Your feedback is always welcome! Please use the form below. If you enter
your email address, the author can respond to your comment. Not all feedback
can be answered personally, of course, but you will find most of it on
the Mailbag page. Please allow at least one week for it to be published.
Thanks for reading The Price of Liberty!
Please
note: Information about readers is never given or sold to anyone
for any purpose. Remember, however, that many people can read and recover
anything posted to web sites or email unless it is carefully encrypted.
MamaLiberty)
Visit the
Rational
Review News Digest
|