Libertarian Commentary on The News by Nathan A. Barton - Price of Liberty
11/21/08
Libertarian Commentary on The News
By Nathan A. Barton © 2006


Mission Statement
Revised 8.04.04
 
Editorial Policy Revised 3.19.04
 
See Reader's
Feedback
 
Reader's Forum
 
Looking for Health NEW
 
Commentary
on the News
 
Return to Home Page

March 06, 2006

LIBERTARIAN COMMENTARY ON THE NEWS 27 February to 4 March 2006
Wow! March is here, and so our character for liberty-lovers is suitable to prepare for the Ides AND for Saint Patrick's Day: Watchfulness. Closely related to Caution (last week's character trait), watchfulness is the old idea of being alert - watching the entire world around us to be aware of what is going on that is both good and bad. A person watching only for the bad things will miss a lot of joy, but if we don't keep alert for the bad things, we won't be able to enjoy the good things. And sometimes, before we know it, some good things slip away forever.

Harry Browne, 1933-2006
Los Angeles Times
"Harry Browne, who twice ran for president as the Libertarian Party candidate, has died. He was 72. Browne, an author and investment adviser, died at his home Wednesday night, family friend Jim Babka said. He died of Lou Gehrig's disease. Browne received 485,134 votes, or 0.5 percent, for president in 1996 and 384,431, or 0.367 percent, in 2000." (03/02/06)

For libertarians, this is surely the top news of the week. Harry succumbed to this long-fought neurological disorder, and his influence, for good and bad in libertarian electoral politics, will be felt for a long time, even if in general politics he will be barely a footnote. Our condolences to his family and friends, who will miss him deeply. Although many of us disagreed with him an his tactics, I'll call him a libertarian long before I will the subject of the next story.

Mama's Note: I met Harry Brown many years ago during the Ed Clark years in California. He was a good and gentle man and I believe that politics never changed that. Rest in peace.

UK: Blair calls self "libertarian"
The Age [Australia]
"British Prime Minister Tony Blair, accused both nationally and from within his own Labour Party of undermining civil liberties, said his critics were mistaken and out of touch with reality. ... He only won key votes this month on banning smoking in public places, introducing national identification cards and anti-terrorism laws by significantly changing initial proposals to head off a revolt from his own lawmakers. 'I accept the good faith of our critics. I just believe them to be profoundly mistaken,' Blair wrote in the Observer newspaper in an article entitled 'I don't destroy liberties, I protect them.' ... Blair said he was the most libertarian and accountable prime minister, bringing in key human rights legislation ... Blair introduced controversial Antisocial Behaviour Orders - known as ASBO's .... 'People should be prevented from glorifying terrorism. You can say it is a breach of the right of free speech but in the real world, people get hurt when organisations encourage hatred ...'" [RRND editor's note: Well, now we know Blair uses hallucinogens - TLK] (02/27/06)

Obviously Gordon Brown is the villain in this piece - or is this a mellerdrammar? He must be Tony's evil twin and doing all the nasty stuff, stifled only by Tony's deeply-held beliefs in - something.

Mama's Note: Blair may well be as mad as the hatter, but he's also the victim of those who work so hard to rewrite the meanings of words. He may sincerely believe what he's saying, but if so, he can't have much of a clue what "libertarian" really means. Unfortunately, a lot of people who use the word have various shades of understanding as well. Words have meaning, but if that meaning can be diluted, distorted and undermined, our communication becomes much more difficult. I suggest that we use that single word much less and concentrate our efforts on talking about non-aggression, justice and truth - demonstrating them in every aspect of our lives. Let's "walk the talk."

The Danish Cartoon War and Other Free Speech News
More this week, but at least, no more deaths apparently.
Too many Iraqis are busy killing each other, and the bloodbath seems to have drawn the attention of the rest of the Ummah.

The End of Euro-Tolerance?
Newsweek
Weren't the Dutch supposed to be the nicest people on earth, the most tolerant nation in Europe, a melting pot for minorities and immigrants since the Renaissance? No longer, and in this the Dutch are once again at the forefront of changes in Europe. This time, the Dutch model for Europe is one of multiculturalism besieged, if not plain defunct.

Yeah, I know, I'm really slumming. CSM is bad enough, but I have to go to Newsweek? But this is important: even Newsweek (competing with Time for the title Isvestya of the Atlantic Seaboard) has to recognize that the Cartoon Wars are here. Of course, they still have the education of a GRTF-schooled fourth grader - the "melting pot" (a metaphor stolen from the US and not really applicable to Europe EXCEPT possibly the Netherlands 1880-1950 or England before 1700) is not about "multiculturalism" but about ASSIMILATION into a single UNIFIED society. They don't get it - melting, blending, merging together, like that pasta sauce before it burns, like mayonnaise!

I have several questions:
1. Are they serious about it? The politicians, I mean, that are calling for integration and an end to purdah and "No speakee Engliss" (or French or German)? Somehow, I doubt it - because they will be seeking the votes and fearing UN sanctions and losing oil.
2. Is this happening fast enough, soon enough? Again, I doubt it: Europe is not-breeding itself out of existence, but that is only a later step of a more serious problem and cause: a loss of faith in anything - a malaise not unlike what sapped Rome, combined with the idea that government (more government, especially) is the answer to everything, that indeed, government IS god.

When post-Christian Europe sees its "Islamic cleric accreditation" schemes fail and it runs out of bedpan changers and fast-food mechanics, it will again (just as Rome did) invite the barbarians in as "guest workers" without any strings attached. Just as the US is doing on all sides. And the rest of this article stupidly shows that even as Europe doesn't get it, neither do Newsweek's writers nor editors. Their solution for Europe is MORE multiculturalist claptrap, MORE accommodation , not assimilation; MORE tolerance for evil instead of rejecting it and other forms of evil. Too bad.

TN: Student in trouble for honking at cops
KIRO TV
"A college student has been given a lesson from a judge after his day in court -- don't correct the police. Clay Palmer, a student at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, honked his car horn when he saw police stop their patrol car, turn on blue flashers to go through a red light and then turn the flashers off. He got a ticket for violating the city noise ordinance. The charge was reduced to a warning Wednesday when he went before a judge who told him he acted wrongly. 'The horn blowing is not the real problem here, it's that you were trying to correct the police and they didn't need correcting,' Judge Russell Bean said. Palmer left traffic court saying he still believed officers were abusing their authority. 'I see this cop with his blue lights come screeching up beside me and I didn't know what was going on,' Palmer said. 'Before they got to the next light, I could see they turned their blue lights off.' Palmer said officer Matthew Puglise forced him onto the hood of his car and issued him a ticket for honking the horn when there was no reason." [FND editor's note: Of course the "nobles" don't any backtalk from the peasants! Anyone who drives much knows that police abuse their "emergency response" lights in this way all the time - TLK] (02/25/06)

And people wonder why there is a J.A.I.L. movement not just in South Dakota but nationwide. I think that Chattanooga needs a Zorro, no?

VA: State nixes doctor/gun bill
News Advance
"Doctors can continue asking patients whether they own and safely store firearms. The Senate Education and Health committee, known for defeating controversial bills, voted down legislation that would have made it unlawful to routinely ask patients about firearms. The committee killed the bill after hearing from doctors who said the bill would prevent them from properly caring for their patients, especially children and domestic violence victims. ... The bill would have allowed doctors to ask about gun ownership if the question was relevant to the patient's health, but specifically barred questioning for statistical use or to justify patient counseling. ... The bill's chief patron, Del. Ward Armstrong, D-Henry, said the bill was not a gun-rights bill but a privacy-rights bill. 'In this day and age it's pretty tough to protect and maintain our privacy,' said Armstrong. 'You're there to get a mole removed and you get asked about your private life.' Although patients can currently refuse to offer such information, Armstrong said the bill would protect less-assertive people from privacy intrusion." (02/24/06)

I have no problem with allowing medical personnel to ASK, and this patron was wrong to do this - but if MY doctor asked me that, I don't know how I would answer. My first reaction, was "MYOB!" [Mind Your Own Business - a motto that used to be on American coins and should be again.] But then, I would probably (since it is MY doctor, that I picked for a number of reasons) say, "Of course - do I LOOK stupid enough not to have at least one for every member of the family?" As for "safe storage" - of course. The only safe weapon is a loaded one, ready to your hand when you need it, and able therefore to keep you safe. Of course, that requires teaching your children at a very young age to be responsible and know what is deadly and what is not - stoves, swimming pools, polecats, and guns, at least.

Mama's Note: Those who know their doctors well and have chosen them carefully might find this question an opportunity to teach. Those who have no choice which doctors they will see would probably be better off telling them that they do not see any reason to answer such a personal and irrelevant question. You can bet that the answer will be recorded, whatever you say.

VA: Slumber party draws child porn investigation
Roanoke Times
"Teenage slumber-party antics resulted in four Botetourt County juveniles being investigated for child pornography, according to a release from the county's sheriff's office. During a sleepover on Dec. 28, according to the release, a teenage girl photographed two other teenage girls. The photographs were e-mailed to a teenage boy. The incident involved two 14-year-old girls, a 15-year-old girl and a 15-year-old boy. State law prohibits the release of information resulting in the identification of juveniles, the sheriff's office said. Juvenile authorities, consulting with Botetourt Commonwealth's Attorney Joel Branscom, decided to treat the incident as a diversion, informally handling the juvenile cases instead of going to court. The matter remains open, however, and the teens could still be prosecuted until they turn 18." [editor's note: Hmm ... the law says they're too young and naive to consent to sex or to "sexual photography" ... but they may be prosecuted for engaging in either. And they're calling the kids juvenile? - TLK] (02/27/06)

Remember when you used to have to worry only about having the Man wait for you at the place outside town where the speed limit changes, if you got a cop or the sheriff mad at you? No longer, with the tens of thousands of felonies on the books. More than ever today, the law is a hammer for anyone with a grudge or looking to get a bit more power.

Mama's Note: Once again - where were the parents? The parents are responsible for the safety and morals of their children until they are ready to be responsible for themselves. There is no magic about the 18th birthday, of course, and some never accept full repsonsibility for themselves, including parents, but that's the place to start.

Government-Ruined, Theft-Funded Schools
A few examples of public school silliness (or stupidity) and that of their masters in statehouses.

UT: House kills "anti-science" bill
Houston Chronicle
"House lawmakers scuttled a bill that would have required public school students to be told that evolution is not empirically proven -- the latest setback for critics of evolution. The bill's sponsor, Republican state Sen. Chris Buttars, had said it was time to rein in teachers who were teaching that man descended from apes and rattling the faith of students. The Senate earlier passed the measure 16-12. But the bill failed in the House on a 28-46 vote Monday. The bill would have required teachers to tell students that evolution is not a fact and the state doesn't endorse the theory." (02/28/06)

Hardly a setback - more an advance that was (probably temporarily) stymied by the arrogance of the supporters of a bizarre and untenable religion. But evolution shall never lack for supporters as long as the mainstream media exists, as this Houston article proves. Like statists and other authoritarians, evolutionists are so afraid of open discussion and challenge that they go completely overboard in their response - a situation which makes them more vulnerable to future attacks.

AZ: English-only immersion debated for schools
Arizona Republic
"In November 2000, Arizona voters approved the most restrictive English-only education law in the country and prohibited textbooks, materials, bulletin boards, or teaching in any language but English. Two years later, voters reinforced their message by electing a state schools chief who promised tougher enforcement of the new law. The law nearly eliminated bilingual education programs that had been widely used in Arizona schools, classes with specially trained teachers that combined instruction in Spanish and English. To help schools comply with the new law, the state developed a model English-only immersion program. Under the model, English-learners would be placed in English immersion classes of five to 15 students with a specially trained teacher and a teaching assistant. State planners said most students would learn enough English in one year to keep up with their peers in regular classes by their second year." (02/28/06)

I suppose that this entire idea has been tested, and that the educrats can provide proof that it will work? Of course not, but don't worry - they're professionals and they know best. Expect a new generation of non-English speaking barrio-dwellers. Get your kids out of the (government) schools, now!

Alumni vow Dillard will survive Katrina
Washington Times
"There were no VIPS, no velvet rope and no valet parking. The nonpolitical fundraiser had a simple purpose that is rare in Washington: to raise money rather than to elevate the egos of the party givers. Michael D. Jones and his wife, Shaun, hosted a Mardi Gras party to benefit his hurricane-ravaged alma mater in New Orleans, Dillard University, founded in 1869 to educate former slaves. Ranked by U.S. News & World Report as one of the best liberal arts universities in the South, Dillard is a jewel among historically black colleges. After Hurricane Katrina hit, the oak-shaded campus lost three dormitories, sustained $340 million in damages and was left in more than 10 feet of water." (02/28/06)

If this school were serious about education, they would consider this as an opportunity to get out of this scummy excuse for a city, and go to someplace decent, like Gulfport or Biloxi.

Mama's Note: They would also take this as an opportunity to get out from under the heavy hand of government that dictates what they do in exchange for all that stolen loot used to fund their operation. We know what they are and understand they are only haggling over the price.

Home Front Antics
As the first story tells us, not all threats are credible or "new" as people would have us believe. Some have in fact been around for decades, and some are INSIDE the government, really!

FL: Neo-Nazis retreat early, swamped by critics, police
Orlando Sentinel
"More than 500 counterprotesters held back by 300 police officers drowned out the message of a neo-Nazi group that marched through Orlando's historic black Parramore neighborhood Saturday. Twenty-two members of the National Socialist Movement, some wearing khaki uniforms with swastika armbands, finished their march with a rally outside the federal courthouse that could not be heard over the jeering crowd. The group shut down the rally 90 minutes early and left town. Seventeen people were arrested, all of them from the crowd separated from the neo-Nazis by lines of police in riot gear. Police and civic leaders expressed pride that the event ended without the violence some had feared." (02/26/06)

These sorts of incidents always make me laugh - the "counterprotesters" are so abysmally comical and do the job the marchers want them to do - help them make an impact on the area.

Mama's Note: What if they staged a "riot" and nobody came? The best thing to do about these things might be to ignore them - or just laugh at them. Maybe that's what these "counterprotesters did?

Seven arrested in anti-war protest
Truthout
"Holding a banner that read 'GOD FORGIVE AMERICA,' seven peace activists were arrested yesterday in front of the White House, in a civil disobedience protest against the war in Iraq. Arrested by US Park Police were Brian Terrell, Ed Bloomer, and Elton Davis, all from Catholic Worker communities in the Des Moines, Iowa, area; David Goodner, a University of Iowa student; Eileen Hansen, a Catholic Worker from the Winona, Minnesota; Jeff Leys, co-coordinator of Voices for Creative Nonviolence (VCNV); and Bernie Meyer, a retired social services worker from Olympia, Washington. The seven were charged with the federal misdemeanor of demonstrating without a permit, fined seventy-five dollars, and released yesterday evening. The action was part of VCNV's 'Winter of Our Discontent' demonstrations in the month leading up to the third anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq on March 20. " [editor's note: Oh, the horror -- demonstrating without a permit - MLS] (02/28/06)

I cannot believe that we still have stupid laws like requiring a permit for free speech - what about a permit for printing a newspaper? Or for writing for one? Or a permit for assembling for worship?

Governors: Bush policies weakening National Guard
New York Times
"Governors of both parties said Sunday that Bush administration policies were stripping the National Guard of equipment and personnel needed to respond to hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, forest fires and other emergencies. 'We should be increasing the number of National Guard combat brigades, not reducing it,' Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco [D-LA] said. Tens of thousands of National Guard members have been sent to Iraq, along with much of the equipment needed to deal with natural disasters and terrorist threats in the United States, the governors said here at the winter meeting of the National Governors Association. The National Guard, which traces its roots to the colonial militia, has a dual federal-state role. Governors normally command the Guard in their states, but Guard members deployed overseas in support of a federal mission are under the control of the president. The governors said they would present their concerns to President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Monday." (02/27/06)

This echoes a call a few others and I have made since as early as 1990 or 1989 - the end of the Cold War should have seen exactly the opposite of what happened to the reserve forces, especially the Guard: instead of cutting the Guard, every two active duty personnel slots should have been replaced by one new Guard slot, and returned the nation at least somewhat to its volunteer PART-TIME tradition, and reduced Federal control over the State forces. So these politicians are only 15 years behind the times.

89 Senators repudiate oaths of office
Indianapolis Star
"The Senate gave its blessing Thursday to the renewal of the USA Patriot Act ... President Bush applauded the Senate for overcoming "partisan attempts to block its passage." The House was expected to approve the two-bill package next week and send it to the president, who would sign it before 16 provisions expire March 10. The bill passed 89-10." (03/03/06)

The headline is that of RRND, but seems to be about right. The fairly short battle is over, and now we have to see both what damage the USA PATRIOT Act will do, and what next will be proposed as "Must-have" legislation to win a war and lose a struggle.

Our Imperial Court System
The Supremes are clearly in session and lots of news about their doings:
On Monday the Court met.
On Tuesday " " "
On Wednesday " " ".
You get the idea.

Supreme Court reconsiders political censorship law
Fox News
"The Supreme Court on Tuesday will revisit its 30-year-old standing precedent on campaign finance reform in a case that could break new ground in time for the upcoming midterm elections. The debate at hand is over Vermont's Act 64. The 1997 law limits the amount of private contributions to a candidate, political committee or party. It also limits expenditures each can make and establishes rules for receiving public financing for campaigns. Act 64 has never fully gone into effect because of lower courts' mixed verdicts on whether it violates a constitutional right to free speech. In the case to be heard this week, the justices will decide whether the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals was correct in concluding that the high court's 1976 Buckley v. Valeo ruling did not contain a sweeping prohibition of mandatory spending limits that would negate Act 64." [FND editor's note: Although you wouldn't know it from this article, the Libertarian Party of Vermont has been a prime mover behind getting this suit heard - SAT] (02/27/06)

We have made such a hash of representative government that our elections have been turned into such high-stake contests that the money flow has become a significant part of our economy, and a source of all kinds of evil. But our short-sighted view of things makes it impossible to truly correct the situation, so bandaid approaches are tried which often not only fail to resolve the problem, but make matters worse. And then, THEN, the courts come in and slash-and-burn and truly make it a stinking mess.

Supreme Court backs abortion protestors
Yahoo! News
"The Supreme Court dealt a setback Tuesday to abortion clinics in a two-decade-old legal fight over anti-abortion protests, ruling that federal extortion and racketeering laws cannot be used to ban demonstrations. The 8-0 decision ends a case that the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had kept alive despite a 2003 ruling by the high court that lifted a nationwide injunction on anti-abortion groups led by Joseph Scheidler and others. ... In Tuesday's ruling, Justice Stephen Breyer said Congress did not intend to create 'a freestanding physical violence offense' in the federal extortion law known as the Hobbs Act. Instead, Breyer wrote, Congress chose to address violence outside abortion clinics in 1994 by passing the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which set parameters for such protests." (02/28/06)

I do think this headline is a bit misleading: the Supremes, for once in a blue moon, have decided to back ALL protestors, both of popular and unpopular causes - especially those who protest groups with big budgets for shysters.

Mideast Tarbabies
This week saw a massive surge in fighting but not against the Coalition as much as internal. I am not including a blow-by-blow, day-by-day account of the killing this week in Iraq: we don't need to be reminded, yet again, of the many ways that people kill other people for sport and political purposes. This still is a huge section this week, with items from Israel, Canaan, Iran, Syria, and elsewhere in the briar patch.

Iraqi People Targeted
Spacewar.com
Washington DC (UPI) Feb 27, 2006 - Iraq's insurgents were stepping up their campaign of assassination again against the new Iraqi armed forces even before they triggered nationwide civil strife with their attack on the Golden Mosque in Samara last Wednesday. According to the Iraq Index Project of the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, 83 Iraqi policemen and soldiers were killed by insurgent action in the 16 days from Feb. 7 through Feb. 22.

Yeah, quoting from a site that Google won't index. Bad me. But this article makes the point I was trying to make last week, but much better than I did. The West, and the Coalition forces, have become a sideshow as Muslim butchers Muslim in the name of Allah, on a scale that "Christendom" has not seen since the Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre or perhaps the Thirty Years' War - that makes the Troubles in Northern Ireland look like a casualty list from a rugby game.

Iraq: Bombers kill 47, injure 130
Geo World News [Pakistan]
"Bombers killed at least 47 people, including four British soldiers, in Iraq on Tuesday as tanks guarded mosques amid fears of a new outbreak of violence. Three bombs went off in quick succession in various areas of Baghdad, killing at least 43 people and wounding 130, a security official and medics said. ... In southern Iraq, four British soldiers were killed on Tuesday, the defence ministry in London told media. Iraqi police said a roadside bomb targeted a British patrol on the outskirts of the southern city." (02/28/06)

Now, here is an interesting question - is this uptick in Muslim-on-Muslim murder both a direct result AND the intended result of the US and Coalition actions in Iraq and the rest of the world - i.e, are we intending to split Islam into warring factions even more than they have been historically? Are we not referees but rather choreographers in Iraq's killing fields?

Mama's Note: Very good question, and one that had not occurred to me. It's something to think about, indeed. But couldn't that be done without spending so much on this invasion and without the death of so many Americans? I wonder...

Iraq: "Night of carnage" raises death toll
KYW CBS 3 News
"Gunmen stormed an electricity substation and slaughtered Shiite factory workers in separate attacks during a night of carnage that killed at least 19 people in Baghdad's southeastern suburbs, police said Friday. The attacks raised the toll from Thursday's violence to 58. Iraqi police and soldiers took to the streets Friday to enforce a daytime ban on private vehicles in an effort to blunt a surge of sectarian violence that has pushed Iraq to the edge of civil war. ... Security forces sealed off Baghdad, preventing most vehicles from entering or leaving the city of 7 million, said Capt. Adil Mohan of the traffic police. Armed police and soldiers in bulletproof vests manned checkpoints across the capital, preventing most cars and motorcycles from leaving their neighborhoods. Militiamen loyal to radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr were also out in force in the teeming Shiite slum known as Sadr City, helping police check cars and patrol the area." (03/03/06)

As I said above, I'm NOT doing a day-by-day repetition of the bloodletting news from Iraq. Suffice to say that this story explains what has happened all week, as radicals in both the Shi'a and Sunni camps try to push the nation into complete civil war, trying simultaneously for power in their own nation and the whole of the Ummah, and using the Coalition as the anvil to their hammers. The people of Iraq seem willing to let the radicals and jihadists control their destinies and destroy their futures.

Iraq: 1,300 dead in past week
MSNBC
"Grisly attacks and other sectarian violence unleashed by last week's bombing of a Shiite shrine have killed more than 1,300 Iraqis, making the past few days the deadliest of the war outside of major U.S. offensives, according to Baghdad's main morgue. The toll was more than three times higher than the figure previously reported by the U.S. military and the news media. Hundreds of unclaimed dead lay at the morgue at midday Monday -- blood-caked men who had been shot, knifed, garroted or apparently suffocated by the plastic bags still over their heads." (02/27/06)

The numbers in this article were immediately challenged on Wednesday in the press and media. Like numbers during and after Katrina, it is easy to make outlandish claims and demand that the "other side" prove that they aren't wrong.

Negroponte: Iraq may spark regional battle
Tampa Tribune
"A civil war in Iraq could lead to a broader conflict in the Middle East, pitting the region's rival Islamic sects against each other, National Intelligence Director John Negroponte said in an unusually frank assessment Tuesday. 'If chaos were to descend upon Iraq or the forces of democracy were to be defeated in that country ... this would have implications for the rest of the Middle East region and, indeed, the world,' Negroponte said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on global threats." (02/28/06)

Frankly, I thought that there was already a series of broad conflicts in the Middle East: the Muslims (including the Arab majority) against the Israelis (Jews, if you prefer) which has been going on for about 90 years; the Sunni versus Shi'a fight, which has been going on for a good thousand years; the Iranian Muslims versus the Turkish Muslims versus the Arab Muslims, which has been going on for about 800 years; the Kurds versus everyone else, in at least four countries, for about 500 years; the Muslims versus the christians, Druze, and animists (plus others), for about 1400 years; the Anglo-American colonialists/neo-colonialists versus the indigenes, for about two hundred years; the various Arab clans or tribes with each other, since Ishmael's second son was born, apparently; oh, and of course, the fight between freedom and tyranny. Negroponte may be right, but he understates the history of that poor, benighted land.

India: Maoist rebels kill 55
swissinfo [Switzerland]
"Maoist rebels set off a landmine under a truck on Tuesday in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh, killing 55 people and wounding at least 20 who belonged to a government-backed anti-Maoist group, police said. The attack came on the eve of a visit to the country by U.S. President George W. Bush and was one of the worst single acts of violence by Maoists in the past three decades. Analysts said the attack showed New Delhi could ill-afford to take the growing Maoist threat lightly, saying that the rebels posed a bigger danger than Kashmiri Islamist militants." (02/28/06)

Of course, it isn't just religious folks killing each other - Communists can do a hideous job, also - as history should remind us.

Iran reportedly aims to widen nuke program
Detroit Free Press
"Iran appears determined to expand its uranium enrichment program -- a key international concern because of fears it could eventually make nuclear weapons, the International Atomic Energy Agency said in a new report Monday. The U.N. watchdog, in a confidential report made available to The Associated Press, said Iran plans to start setting up thousands of uranium enriching centrifuges this year even as it negotiates with Russia on scrapping such domestic activity." (02/27/06)

Iran appears to be close to winning, despite all the wailing and moaning that the West is making.

US settles kidnapping victim's suit
BBC News [UK]
"The US government has agreed to pay $300,000 (£172,000) to settle a lawsuit brought by an Egyptian arrested after the 11 September attacks, reports say. Ehab Elmaghraby was detained for nearly a year and deported after being cleared of links to terrorism. ... The settlement, in which the government did not admit wrongdoing, is said to be the first involving claims of dozens of Muslims arrested after 9/11. ... The US government has dismissed the claims, saying that the circumstances of the 11 September attacks justified extraordinary measures to confine non-citizens who fell under suspicion." (02/28/06)

An interesting thing - the FedGov settles but dismisses the claims. This is the biggest goat rope in a while - and shows the problem in fighting a war with an enemy that has no uniforms and normal military organization: are these guys really the enemy or not? In this case, apparently not.

Mama's Note: The big problem here is that you and I were forced to pay for this, not the people responsible for the crime. We won't see any end to this until those who do such things are held both legally and financially liable for their actions. Please don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

Syria: Opposition rejects US funding
Yahoo! News
"Syria's liberal opposition has said it will not accept money from a U.S. offer to fund democratic groups in the country, saying that its credibility would be damaged if it took the cash. A group of a dozen parties, known as the Damascus Declaration, said on Monday they had enough resources on their own to press ahead with a campaign for peaceful change to end a 40-year monopoly by the Baath Party on power. 'The Damascus Declaration refuses foreign funding, including the $5 million from the U.S. State Department for the Syrian opposition,' a statement by the group said." (02/28/06)

Huh! Honest opponents to a dishonest regime - rare as hen's teeth. I suppose that the various worldwide libertarians might see if this should be funded, or it is just another case of wantabe tyrants.

Postwar Iraq chaos blamed on poor planning
Indianapolis Star
"Poor prewar planning left the United States without enough skilled workers to efficiently rebuild Iraq's economy and public works, according to a report issued Monday. The study by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction provided a new explanation for the lagging reconstruction effort. Surveys by the Bush administration and congressional auditors have blamed insurgent attacks and the high cost of security. Thanks to inadequate planning, the report said, early occupation officials lacked enough reconstruction staffers who knew what they were doing." (02/27/06)

This should make us all concerned that this is the same government that everyone expects to help American states recover after massive natural or manmade disasters. If we can't plan and have adequate people to rebuild a country of just 25 million, what will happen when the next Katrina hits a REALLY important American city instead of just New Orleans? As I recall, the greater LA-San Diego has a bigger population (and larger land area, I think) than Iraq. So does Texas, and New England.

Poll: Iraq troops support US withdrawal
Zogby International
"An overwhelming majority of 72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and nearly one in four say the troops should leave immediately, a new Le Moyne College/Zogby International survey shows. The poll, conducted in conjunction with Le Moyne College's Center for Peace and Global Studies, showed that 29% of the respondents, serving in various branches of the armed forces, said the U.S. should leave Iraq 'immediately,' while another 22% said they should leave in the next six months. Another 21% said troops should be out between six and 12 months, while 23% said they should stay 'as long as they are needed.'" [editor's note: 29% is not "nearly one in four" -- it's "nearly one in three" - TLK] (02/28/06)

If this poll is as legit as the one announced yesterday that found Bush and Cheney at their lowest numbers ever, this news item is worthless. For one thing, I question the validity and lack of bias of a poll conducted "in conjunction with" a center for "peace studies" - especially from a liberal college like Le Moyne. Second, of COURSE troops want to come home - nobody thinks what is going on in Iraq is fun, but as with such polls, the questions are always worded to give the results the sponsors want.

Israel: Terror leader said killed in Gaza attack
Houston Chronicle
"Israel launched an airstrike on a car in Gaza City on Wednesday, killing the top commander of the Islamic Jihad militant group, Palestinian police said. Khaled Dahdouh, 39, was targeted in the attack, police said. The Israeli military had no immediate comment. Abu Dajana, a spokesman for Islamic Jihad's military wing, vowed revenge." (03/01/06)

Revenge for revenge for revenge? Of course, Islamic Jihad is one of these groups that "shouldn't exist" according to the "mainstream" of that religion of love and peace, Islam, since they obviously don't think "jihad" means "spiritual struggle."

Afghanistan: Prisoner says armed inmates roaming free
CNN
"Prisoners armed with chains and knives are roaming Afghanistan's highest-security prison after negotiations to quell the uprising broke down Tuesday, said an American prisoner taken hostage by his fellow inmates. 'They're afraid that the police are going to storm in and kill more people,' said Edward Caraballo, speaking on a cell phone from inside the prison. It was not clear how Caraballo obtained the phone. He is one of three Americans being held at Policharki Prison and has been there since he was convicted two years ago of torturing Afghans in a private jail." (02/28/06)

Sounds like Mexico, Honduras, or a good many other places around the world. Not exactly encouraging to Americans who have been trying to make a difference for almost five years now.

Pakistanis hit militants on Afghan border
Cincinnati Enquirer
"Pakistani security forces backed by helicopter gunships struck a militant hideout Wednesday in a tribal region near the Afghan border, killing or wounding at least 25 militants, an official said. The militants had entered Pakistan's North Waziristan tribal region after a raid inside Afghanistan. Army troops and three helicopter gunships attacked them, said Syed Zaheerul Islam, the top government administrator of the region. He said between 25 and 30 militants were killed or wounded in the raid. He said militants were running a training camp and that the strike triggered explosions in an arms dump at the site." (02/28/06)

Definition of a "militant" - anyone whose body is found after a gunship attack? This may be true, but I just have a hard time believing that the Pakis can do this, but anytime the US or Coalition attacks a camp, it is a peaceful wedding party.

US pays MIT to plumb chemistry of Iraq IEDs
Boston Globe
"The Pentagon is staking $3 million on a small team of students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to help the military identify new ways of disarming the kind of homemade bombs that insurgents are using to kill and maim US troops in Iraq, according to Defense Department documents and researchers. Under the auspices of the Office of Naval Research, the Pentagon will fund a research project led by MIT chemistry professor Keith A. Nelson that is analyzing the molecular interaction of explosive materials. The goal of the three-year program, Nelson said, is to study the physics and chemistry of improvised explosive devices -- known as IEDs -- and find techniques to detonate or short-circuit them before they cause harm. 'We are studying the microscopic mechanisms that are characteristic of the core materials that bad guys use in IEDS,' Nelson said in an interview yesterday. 'There is a whole set of things that have to happen to get [a detonation] and we are studying the chemistry in small amounts of energetic materials.'" (02/28/06)

Some congrus-crittur is crowing loudly about this one, you bet. The entire description of the project (which, admittedly, the Boston Glob may have bungled) sounds bogus - it is not "microscopic" mechanisms that need to be understood, it is the basics of munitions design and structures and mechanics and electronics. More money flushed down the toilet, in the state that really knows how to do so, especially to federal taxpayers' money.

Afghanistan: Five Canadian troops wounded in attack
http://tinyurl.com/f8nhh
Reuters
"Five Canadian soldiers were wounded, one seriously, in a suspected suicide car bomb attack on their armoured vehicle in southern Afghanistan on Friday, the Canadian military said. The attack happened about 15 km outside the city of Kandahar, and not far from the airport where Canadian troops are based. Taliban spokesman Qari Mohammad Yousuf said guerrillas were responsible." (03/03/06)

You don't often hear about Canadian troopers getting wounded, because there aren't that many of them, and usually, since they withdrew from Germany, they don't do very much but smile and talk a lot. The Taliban needs to be careful - if they had killed these guys instead of just wounding them, they might have gotten Ottawa angry at them - although what effect that might have on the price of eggs in Kandahar (or even Ottawa, for that matter) I haven't the slightest idea.

Hamas, Russian officials begin talks
Ely Times & County
"Hamas leaders met senior Russian officials on Friday in their first talks with a major foreign power since winning a January 25 Palestinian election, but flatly rejected international demands to recognize Israel. Shunned by Israel and the United States since the parliamentary poll, the Islamist militant group whose charter calls for the Jewish state's destruction hoped to gain a measure of international standing from the Moscow talks before forming a government. ... Although the visit dealt a blow to U.S.-led efforts to isolate Hamas, Russia's mediation is seen by some in the West as a chance to push the group into embracing more moderate views." (03/03/06)

The Russians are trying to play peacemaker in this, but getting the same cold shoulder as everyone else. They can see what is causing the US to act as it has.

The Campaign Follies of 2006
More and more items as time marches on. The Ports Deal continued to demand screams and charges.

GOP unease spreads to security issues
MSNBC
"The first heading on the issues page of Rep. Mark Foley's Web site brags that he is 'one of President Bush's strongest supporters in Congress.' The Florida Republican voted for the president's legislation 90 percent of the time, according to the Web site, 'the 3rd highest ranking among the Florida delegation.' Now the Florida delegation's third-strongest Bush supporter is on the front lines of the Republican revolt against the president on the deal to turn over key operations at six U.S. ports to a United Arab Emirates company. Republicans who once marched in lock step behind their president on national security are increasingly willing to challenge him in an area considered his political strength." (02/28/06)

While I do not believe that all opposition to the ports deal (which I see no real problem with) is based on some kind of anti-Arab prejudice or "Islamaphobia," I think the GOP folks like Foley are wrecking their own party with this, perhaps in a desperate attempt to honor principles which they constantly crow about but seldom follow.

Lawmakers vow not to force quick port vote
Detroit Free Press
"Congressional Republicans and Democrats on Tuesday tempered calls for an immediate vote to block a Dubai-based company's takeover of some U.S. port operations as President Bush prodded them to avoid a confrontation. Returning to the Capitol in force for the first time since news of DP World's takeover broke, lawmakers from both parties criticized the White House for failing to let them know about the deal before it became public." (02/28/06)

Someone is finally thinking, but the talk shows are still full of rhetoric over this. As far as "not being told" - what, have these people no internet, no business papers? This sale has been in the works for months. Is this the US's version of the Danish cartoons? All the sudden, it is a horrible thing, going to kill us all? Please. Sadly, this is being used as yet another excuse to increase government control over daily business activities, in the name of "national security".

Mama's Note: Interesting that they are all so worried about taking their time to study and debate this port deal when a far more important and destructive item was pushed through with nobody even reading it, let alone giving it reasoned debate - the so-called "PATRIOT act." I highly doubt that many bothered to read the new version either.

Abandoning Bush
Townhall.com
In a closed-door meeting Tuesday of the top House Republican leadership, the consensus was that President Bush had gotten himself in deep trouble on the Dubai ports management deal and he was on his own to try to save it. Rep. Tom Reynolds was particularly adamant in separating House Republicans from presidential wreckage on the ports affair. As the current chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, Reynolds is responsible for election of enough Republican candidates to retain control of the House.

Watch where you are walking. Clearly, these guys are scared - some are even talking about retiring! No more feed trough. Of course, if they'd had the courage of their convictions the last eleven years, this ports deal wouldn't have been a show breaker - they'd have support and confidence of the American people that comes from exploding economic growth in a true free market without governmental controls and without government sucking up six cents of every dime today, and seven cents tomorrow. So now they worry about principle? Please, you make me sick.

Byrd regrets voting for Patriot Act
ABC News
"Sen. Robert Byrd, the dean of the Senate and its resident constitutional expert, counts only a few regrets in his 48-year Senate career: filibustering the 1964 Civil Rights Act, voting to expand the Vietnam War, deregulating airlines. Add to the list a new one from this century: supporting the anti-terror USA Patriot Act after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. ... This week as he embarks on a re-election campaign for a record ninth term, Byrd, 88, will vote 'no' on renewing 16 major provisions of the act due to expire March 10. ... On a 96-3 test vote earlier this month, Byrd, Feingold and Sen. Jim Jeffords, I-Vt., were the only dissenters. " [FND editor's note: Then, d****t, they should have filibustered with Feingold - MLS] (02/28/06)

New stripes for an old tiger? Hardly. Byrd's career has been one of opportunism and backdealing, and this seems no different - it is just that for once he is using being on what we consider the side of the good guys to feather his own nest. The man is a walking poster for term limits.

MD: Black vote no longer a lock for Democrats
Washington Times
"Black voters' loyalty to the Democratic Party is no longer a certainty in Maryland, especially among young independent voters, several black leaders say. 'We might be the last generation of unabashed loyalists to the Democratic Party,' state Senate Majority Leader Nathaniel J. McFadden of Baltimore says. 'The Democratic Party is no longer a monolith for the African-American community.' Rep. Albert R. Wynn of Prince George's County warns his party's leaders that 'black voters can no longer be taken for granted.' Securing the black vote has become a critical concern among Maryland Democrats in an election year rife with racial politics." (03/02/06)

This is hardly a brainstorm, as the liberal snobbishness has shown more and more clearly. But neither will the GOP gain much - because of a century of indoctrination.

MA: In blow to GOP, Mihos to run as independent
Boston Globe
"Bolting from the Republican Party, wealthy businessman Christy Mihos said yesterday he will run for governor as an independent, a decision that delivers a blow to GOP chances of victory in November. Mihos concluded that the Republican Party establishment and its party rules for qualifying for the ballot were stacked against him, said a Mihos adviser who asked not to be named. Mihos's presence on the November ballot is widely expected to draw independent voters from Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, the probable Republican nominee. 'I'm running as an independent,' Mihos told the Globe last night. 'In the final analysis it was a question of conscience and heart. I'm not part of the establishment Republican Party, and I had to move on and do what I think is right. The party has morphed into what the Democrats are; they are both controlled by special interests.'" (03/02/06)

He definitely is no libertarian, but he might cause as much trouble.

More News and Commentary on Page 2

Nathan Barton is writing from his secret bunker complex on the eastern slopes of the Paha Sapa, swilling Doctor Pepper (and gallons of water each day, milady) and plotting to re-elect Gaius Julius Caesar dictator of the Republic - or was that Senator Palpatine? Granville James Corbin? W? Q?

Be sure to visit my blog, Liberty's Outpost.

Special Feature! Add your signature to the NEW Declaration of Independence
By Robert Greenslade

Several people have asked about buying Gadsden Flags (the rattlesnake "Don't Tread on Me flags used by the June 23d Movement and other Property Rights Organizations: you can get them for $10.00 plus shipping here.


To Read previous Commentaries, go to the archives page and click onto the link for the day. The commentaries are linked from the daily front pages.


Your feedback is always welcome! Please use the form below. If you enter your email address, the author can respond to your comment. Not all feedback can be answered personally, of course, but you will find most of it on the Mailbag page. Please allow at least 48 hours for it to be published. Thanks for reading The Price of Liberty!

Please note: Information about readers is never given or sold to anyone for any purpose. Remember, however, that many people can read and recover anything posted to web sites or email unless it is carefully encrypted. MamaLiberty)

Whose values?

Visit the Rational Review News Digest

Links to Previous
Commentaries
are on the front page for each day. Check the archives page.

[Some article sources require registration, use this link)


Submit Feedback

Name: