In Defense of Polish Plumbers By Alvaro Vargas Llosa Price of Liberty
11/21/08
In Defense of Polish Plumbers
By Alvaro Vargas Llosa


Mission Statement
 
Editorial Policy
 
Submissions
 
Letters to the Editor
 
Feedback
 
Discussion Forum
 
Return to Home Page

February 20, 2006

Those modern Cassandras who continue to rail against the calamities that foreign workers bring to countries that do not keep them out at gunpoint ought to take a look at a new report from the European Commission. This executive body of the European Union (EU), an entity that has never been accused of promoting economic freedom, has just thrown a devastating report in the face of the 12 countries that chose to close the door to migrant workers from central and eastern Europe.

Two years ago, just as ten central and eastern European nations were about to join the EU, bringing the total number of members to 25, a continent-wide hysteria against “Polish plumbers” broke out. Convinced that the free movement of labor—a supposed pillar of the EU—would bring about a flood of poor central and eastern European workers desperate to earn better salaries or apply for welfare benefits in the richer nations, western Europeans began to demonize Polish plumbers. I remember being struck at the time by terrifying headlines repeating the same mantra from Madrid to Berlin: Polish plumbers were the new version of the bubonic plague. Consequently, of the 15 members of the EU at the time, only three—Britain, Ireland, and Sweden—decided to give workers from the ten new member countries the freedom to live and work almost without restrictions. The rest of the EU members imposed a seven-year delay on allowing those workers into their countries.

Now, the European Commission, based on official data from every country in the Union, has published a report that proves the 12 protectionist countries were dead wrong. The three countries that lifted restrictions on labor mobility have seen their economies grow more and create more jobs than the rest because migrant workers have essentially filled skill shortages in construction, restoration, and other services (many are dentists and bus drivers.) There has been no “invasion” of central and eastern European workers. Except for Ireland, where the number is a bit higher, though still small, they amount to no more than 1 percent of the working-age population in the recipient countries. Moreover, restrictions have not stopped workers from moving to those western European countries that chose to keep them out—they are now in the underground economy. Ironically, Austria, the country that places the greatest restrictions on foreign workers, is also the one that got the highest number of migrant workers—all of them posing as “self-employed.” And in those countries where they were welcomed, there has not been an increase in the number of people applying for welfare benefits—the vast majority of workers simply want to work.

How is Europe reacting to this report? Some countries—Finland, Greece, Portugal, and Spain—are thinking seriously about lifting the restrictions. Others—especially Germany, France, and Austria—have announced they will keep the restrictions in place. One can only imagine what the next report, a few years from now, will say about France’s economy, already in a state of chronic stagnation because of protectionist legislation.

The evidence is so powerful that even the European Commission has come out asking all members to give up restrictions against the free movement of labor within the enlarged EU in order to galvanize their economies in these times of heavy competition from other regions of the world. This recommendation faces a very tough opposition from those countries obsessed with protecting themselves from globalization by limiting imports (remember the delightful row over Chinese bras), restricting mergers and acquisitions (note the recent blockage of the takeover of the French company Danone by the American Pepsico or of Banca Italiana del Lavoro by the Spanish BBVA) or, indeed, blocking the free flow of labor.

The debate goes to the very heart of the European Union’s avowed purpose: to encourage the free flow of labor, capital, goods, and services. The lesson is simple: the countries that have followed those principles more closely are doing better. That is why, for instance, Ireland, until a few years ago a poor country, has attracted so much foreign capital that U.S. affiliates account for a fifth of the nation’s gross domestic product today! If the other nations followed the good example, the EU as a whole would shake off its morass.

The wonderful irony of the prejudice against Polish plumbers in countries like France is that France has created dozens of thousands of jobs in France thanks to French investments in Poland.

And, before I forget, most plumbers in Poland are actually from the Ukraine!

Alvaro Vargas Llosa is a Senior Fellow and director of The Center on Global Prosperity at the Independent Institute. He is the author of Liberty for Latin America.

Robert Higgs is Senior Fellow in Political Economy at The Independent Institute, author of Against Leviathan and Crisis and Leviathan, and editor of the scholarly quarterly journal, The Independent Review. Click here for a bio on Dr. Higgs, the noted economist and historian.

Ivan Eland is Senior Fellow and Director of the Center on Peace & Liberty at The Independent Institute in Oakland, CA., and author of the books, The Empire Has No Clothes (forthcoming in October) and Putting “Defense” Back into U.S. Defense Policy.

William Marina is Research Fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif., and Professor Emeritus of History at Florida Atlantic University.

David T. Beito is a Research Fellow at The Independent Institute, Associate Professor of History at the University of Alabama, and co-editor of the book, The Voluntary City: Choice, Community and Civil Society.

William Marina and David T. Beito belong to "Liberty and Power," a group blog at the History News Network.

For further articles and studies, see the Center on Peace & Liberty and OnPower.org.



Nicolas Heidorn is a public policy intern at The Independent Institute in Oakland, California.

For further information, see the Independent Institute’s book on wasteful farm programs, Agriculture and the State: Market Processes and Bureaucracy, by Ernest C. Pasour, Jr.



New from Ivan Eland!
THE EMPIRE HAS NO CLOTHES: U.S. Foreign Policy Exposed
Most Americans don’t think of their government as an empire, but in fact the United States has been steadily expanding its control of overseas territories since the turn of the twentieth century. In The Empire Has No Clothes, Ivan Eland, a leading expert on U.S. defense policy and national security, examines American military interventions around the world from the Spanish-American War to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Buy It Today.


Complete
Archives

What Does the Administration’s Leaked Mea Culpa on Iraq Portend?

Will Iraq’s Constitution Be Irrelevant?

Money for Nothing, or Worse

Top Ten Reasons to “Undo” Iraq in Due Haste

Will the Government’s Abysmal Response to Katrina Recur During a Terrorist Attack?

Sarai State of Affairs

Critics on Iraq Policy Come Out of the Woodwork Too Late

Our Greatest Criminals Are Never Charged With Their Greatest Crimes

Surveillance Society

The New Al Qaeda: More Dangerous than the Old Version

The Failure of Nation-Building in Bosnia and Iraq

Chile’s Pensions Under Fire

TSA Treats for Holiday Travelers

How Latins View the U.S.

Making the World Safe for Theocracy

“War on Terror” Continues to Create Terrorists

More Defense Dollars, Less Security

Submit Feedback

Name: