|
|
|
February 11, 2005 It has been previously written about, and much discussed there appears to be a movement in the United States, within the United Nations, and evidenced by the European Union, to create a "New World Order." Conspiracy theories abound, most evolving around the Rothschild-Rockefeller international banking conclave and manifesting themselves overtly in the Trilateral Commission, Council of Foreign Relations and Bilderberg. The bankers are commonly referred to as "The Illuminati," and are devoted to the concept of Zionist internationalism. A strong indication that some sort of conspiracy exists, or at least that a well-coordinated and harmonically orchestrated series of seemingly coincidental international actions and events occur within some pre-arranged design, thereby providing recurring and consistent evidence of the real likelihood of such a conspiracy's existence. Clearly, such conspiracy is hard to prove unless a key member within it exposes the plot. It is always an insider's breaking ranks that exposes detrimental plotting and planning within a tightly-knit group. (Read the rest here)
The
"Oil-for-Food" Smokescreen Are you familiar with the big shock that neoconservatives have experienced over the financial scandal arising out of the infamous oil-for-food program, which was the subject of an investigative report recently issued by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volker? The oil-for-food program was the government program established in 1995 by U.S. officials and UN officials to alleviate the horrific suffering of the Iraqi people arising out of the brutal system of sanctions that the U.S. government and the UN imposed against the Iraqi people in 1991 and which lasted for more than a decade. While the ostensible goal of the sanctions was to disarm Saddam Hussein of the weapons of mass destruction that the United States and other Western countries had furnished him during the 1980s, the real reason for the sanctions was to oust Saddam from power and replace his regime with one more palatable to the U.S. government. As the New York Times reported on May 21, 1991, President Bush said today that the United States would oppose the lifting of the worldwide ban against trading with Iraq until President Saddam Hussein is forced out of power in Baghdad. (Read the rest here)
Libertarian
Commentary on The News Now that we are officially into Lent, let us see if we can reflect on the things not the way they should be, and what WE can do as individual free lovers of liberty to fix them. Of course, that is assuming that we CAN fix things - but my opinion (like this entire column, not necessarily anyone else's) is that we can, even in small ways, help. I'll start out with some good news. US
to reduce troops in Iraq
New
Articles Posted Every Week Day !
New
Feature At The Price of Liberty
READER'S
FORUM
Special
Feature! Add your signature to the
New
entry! A marvelous list of resources and excellent sites. Take a look!
MamaLiberty is the owner, publisher, writer, chief cook and bottle washer for The Price of Liberty. I'd love to hear from you! I promise to delete any nasty notes, threats or other nonsense. Serious questions and comments will be answered to the best of my ability. Serious writers are also invited to submit articles for consideration. Please see the mission statement and the writer's guidelines first, just to save you time and effort. I don't require exclusives, by any means. Please do not submit someone else's copyrighted material unless it is clearly marked for use on the external oped page. Include a link to it or we can't use it. Thanks! |
Our
Writers Editors And Staff
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Submit
Feedback
|