Social Security II - Privatize The Profits- By Ed Henry -- Price of Liberty
12/03/08
Social Security II - Privatize The Profits
By Ed Henry

Mission Statement Revised 8.04.04
 
Editorial Policy Revised 3.19.04
 
See Reader's
Feedback
 
Reader's Forum
 
Looking for Health NEW
 
Commentary on the News
 
Return to Home Page

November 30, 2004

There is probably no single subject or issue that has so many falsehoods, myths, legends, superstitions, and outright lies surrounding it than does Social Security. Many of these are implanted, promoted, fostered and encouraged by our government itself and range from Ponzi legends to lies about lock-boxes and trust funds. They help to disguise and obscure the greed and corruption of government and need to be broken down one-by-one, a task that cannot be accomplished in less than book form.

The Social Security Administration, headquartered in Baltimore , Maryland , is a highly efficient insurance company. It’s efficient because it operates on less than one percent of its annual budget, maintains offices in almost every sizable city in the country, and has always paid benefits precisely on time. And it pays those benefits from the premiums it collects from new members and the continuous payments of members who have not yet retired or been disabled, the same thing any successful insurance company does.

Of course, what makes this particular insurance company different from all others is the fact that participation is forced by the government through payroll taxes. There are no sales or any form of competition involved. Every American worker has a Social Security number and every employer is forced to participate and contribute.

As an insurance company, Social Security has only two major faults:

1) It’s operated by the not-for-profit federal government, an entity that is not supposed to be engaged in private enterprise.

2) It has usually produced a profit that the government takes (steals) and spends elsewhere. Since 1983, these profits have been continuous and have grown to be enormous reaching a high of $98.7 billion in fiscal 2001 and $71 billion in fiscal 2004 despite a troubled economy.

There are some who would like to take Social Security entirely out of the hands of the federal government and turn it all over to people in the private sector while continuing to enforce participation. The costs and the mechanics of doing this are enormous, estimated in the trillions, but their argument is that in the hands of the government Social Security is a form of socialism, which it is, and depends on the good will of politicians to continue, which is not true. After more than 65 years of operation as “insurance,” Social Security is the greatest implied contract that ever existed.

The simplest, easiest, and most immediate solution is to take the profit away from the government and turn those profits over to the private sector. Privatize the profits by taking them away from the federal not-for-profit organization that shouldn’t have them in the first place. Leave everything else in place.

There are two ways to do this.

The first option would be to cut payroll taxes back to break even. Reduce these taxes by at least 14 percent. This would put immediate cash in the pockets of America's workers and employers as soon as their next paychecks and would not affect benefits at all. In the event of a shortfall, we wouldn’t be in any position different than we are in now.

The second option is to set up a real trust fund in the private sector. A trust where the monthly surpluses Social Security generates are immediately turned over to the trustees of this fund who are not above the law and can be watched and prosecuted if necessary.

We already know that we can’t trust the federal government with the profits. The government itself has already proven that (See: Social Security I). Even if the privatized profits do nothing more than sit in some bank drawing simple interest, the workers and taxpayers of this country will be more than one hundred percent better off than we are today facing a system of double taxation through phony trust funds.

Naturally, such a privatized trust fund would need the stipulation that these funds cannot be invested in U.S. Treasury securities that can only be redeemed by the same people who have created the assets of this trust.

And what does it cost to set up a real trust fund? A few hundred dollars, maybe as much as a thousand or so? Nothing like the bogus reform plans being proposed today.

Too simple a solution

Social Security has become much too great a slush fund for the government to give it up easily. With congressional committees like the Senate and House Budget Committees, Appropriations Committees, Finance Committees, Tax Committees, and others, plus the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the Office of Management and Budgets (OMB), all devoted to anticipating how much can be expected in “off budget” revenue, the idea of cutting payroll taxes comes up only as a threat to the opposition party across the aisle who may be proposing tax cuts for the rich and famous. It’s never a serious threat.

Even within the series of checks and balances our forefathers set up, no bill has ever been introduced to reduce payroll taxes. And if it were, it would simply die on the vine amidst hundreds of hours of debate similar to the “lock-box” legislation that took place when real trust funds are, by their very nature, already lock-boxes. The same can be said for promises not to touch Social Security money.

In fact, the entire idea of “Social Security reform” is nothing more than a weak attempt by the Beltway Bandits to cleanse their consciences of the guilt they feel for stealing the profits and expecting the taxpaying public to cover their loses by paying the same taxes again plus interest.

Worst of all, if they ever did legislate true reform, which is only a matter of not stealing the profits/overpayments, it would lead to the fact that they do exactly the same thing with other entitlements such as their own Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), Military Retirement, veteran’s benefits, gas taxes, unemployment taxes, and more than twenty entitlements and trust funds that they manage.

The crime goes far beyond Social Security which is merely the largest entitlement they plunder. It dwarfs anything done by crooks in the private sector and if truly understood by the taxpaying public could lead to revolt and the absolute loss of power currently in the hands of elected politicians and appointed bureaucrats.

Visit Ed Henry's own web site!

Send a message to your elected representatives. Click here to start. Be sure to send a copy to Ed Henry.

Archives

Anyone But Bush -- And That's What We Got, Anyone

MSN - Money Perpetuating The Myth

Prescription Drugs From Other Countries

Booga-Booga From Greenspeak -- Again

Cagney Factor - Misplaced Hero Worship

Choosing The Lesser Of Two Evils

Four More Reasons To Vote For Bush

Round Three - Wake Up Kerry-

Wrong Questions On Social Security Light

Job Loss Reflected By Social Security

Desperate Bush Turns To Social Security

How To Win, The Easy Way

National Debt Tax - The Silence Is Deafening

Know Your Enemy - Missing Parts Of Usama's Speech

Social Security - Is The Battle Renewed?

Complete Archives for Ed Henry

Submit Feedback

Name: