|
|
|
12/03/08
Bob Schieffer may be a nice old man and a longtime news anchor from CBS, but as far as I'm concerned when it comes to questions on Social Security he's a nitwit, ill informed, or another Bonesman protecting his brothers. To introduce the subject of Social Security, Schieffer started out by saying; "Mr. President, the next question is addressed to you. We all know that Social Security is running out of money, and it has to be fixed ..." From there, he went into Bush's plan for personal accounts. That's one helluva bit of conjecture to repeat the Washington storyboard line that "Social Security is running out of money," especially when the government just stole $71 billion from our retirement insurance during fiscal 2004.
Honor
the Country by Distrusting the Government President Bush and his supporters base their case for his reelection ultimately on an appeal for trust. Bush asks us to trust that he acted in good faith when he invaded Iraq, even though the intelligence now looks bad. He asks us to trust his strategy for domestic security, even though awesome discretionary power is given to the attorney general. He asks us to trust him when he says government shouldnt run our lives, even though he has presided over a frightening growth in government spending. The appeal for trust ought to be a hard sell. Weapons of mass destruction have still not been found. Now we learn from the New York Times that when the administration warned that Saddam Hussein had aluminum tubes intended for making nuclear materials, its experts were saying those tubes were most likely for something else. When all someone can ask for is trust, that is the time for suspicion. (Read the rest here)
Holding
Up a Mirror to the Face of U.S. Exceptionalism
Separated by one hundred and four years, the presidential elections of 1900 and 2004 offer some startling and almost eerie similarities. In 1900 the Democratic challenger, William Jennings Bryan, opposed incumbent Republican William McKinley, ostensibly over the issue of U.S. imperialism in the Philippines, and years later (1937), the Stanford historian, Thomas A. Bailey asked, Was the Election of 1900 a Mandate for Imperialism? (Read the rest here)
Libertarian
Commentary on The Day's News "Freedom's
just another word for nothing left to lose," goes an old song -
but we all know better. "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth
shall make you free." This is the reason we all get depressed,
all too often, by reading or watching or listening to the day's news,
and that is why I provide some views and comments on the news, to help
us all (me especially) get a better perspective on the events. And they
aren't ALL bad, by any means - freedom is NOT lost. So these are my
views, and not necessarily anyone else's, but you're welcome to them,
and to comment on them! Click
Here for the Archives
The Reader's Forum is expanding and many more people are finding it is a good a place to discuss their ideas. Take a look and let us know what you are thinking about the issues of today.
Special
Feature! Add your signature to the
The
Lighter Side of PoL
MamaLiberty is the owner, publisher, writer, chief cook and bottle washer for The Price of Liberty. I'd love to hear from you! I promise to delete any nasty notes, threats or other nonsense. Serious questions and comments will be answered to the best of my ability. Serious writers are also invited to submit articles for consideration. Please see the mission statement and the writer's guidelines first, just to save you time and effort. I don't require exclusives, by any means. Please do not submit someone else's copyrighted material unless it is clearly marked for use on the external oped page. Include a link to it or we can't use it. Thanks! |
Our
Writers Editors And Staff
|
||||||||||||||||||